Fire Effects Information System (FEIS)
FEIS Home Page

SPECIES: Leymus salinus

INTRODUCTORY


AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION:
Anderson, Michelle D. 2004. Leymus salinus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/leysal/all.html [].

Revisions: On 3 October 2017, the common name of this species was changed in FEIS from: Salina wildrye
to: saline wildrye.

FEIS ABBREVIATION:
LEYSAL

SYNONYMS:
Elymus salinus M.E. Jones [19,22,34,35,69]
        = Leymus salinus (M.E. Jones) A. Love subsp. salinus [33]

NRCS PLANT CODE: [62]
LESA4
LESAM
LESAS
LESAS2

COMMON NAMES:
saline wildrey
Salina wildrye
Salinus wildrye
saline wildrye
salt wildrye

TAXONOMY:
The scientific name of saline wildrye is Leymus salinus (M.E. Jones) A. Love (Poaceae) [10,33,41,68].

Salina wildrye subspecies are as follows:

Leymus salinus ssp. salinus
Leymus salinus (M.E. Jones) A. Love subsp. mohavensis Barkworth & Atkins [10,30,33]
Leymus salinus (M.E. Jones) A. Love subsp. salmonis (C.L. Hitchc.) Atkins [10,30,33]

Saline wildrye (L. s. subsp. salmonis) hybridizes with bottlebrush squirreltail (Elymus elymoides), though resulting plants are sterile [32].

LIFE FORM:
Graminoid

FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS:
No special status

OTHER STATUS:


DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Leymus salinus
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION:
Saline wildrye is distributed throughout the Great Basin, Southwest, and Rocky Mountain states, extending from California east to Colorado and New Mexico, and north to Montana. However, the range of each subspecies varies [33]. L. s. ssp. mohavensis is found primarily in California and Arizona [30,33], though it is also reported in Colorado, Nevada and Utah [30].L. s. ssp. salinus occurs throughout the range of saline wildrye except in California and Idaho, while L. s. ssp. salmonis occurs in Idaho, Nevada, and western Utah [6,33].

Plants database provides a distributional map of Saline wildrye and its infrataxa.

ECOSYSTEMS [25]:
FRES21 Ponderosa pine
FRES29 Sagebrush
FRES30 Desert shrub
FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub
FRES35 Pinyon-juniper
FRES36 Mountain grasslands
FRES40 Desert grasslands

STATES/PROVINCES: (key to state/province abbreviations)
UNITED STATES

AZ CA CO ID MT NV NM UT WY

BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [14]:
5 Columbia Plateau
6 Upper Basin and Range
7 Lower Basin and Range
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
9 Middle Rocky Mountains
10 Wyoming Basin
11 Southern Rocky Mountains
12 Colorado Plateau

KUCHLER [39] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:
K011 Western ponderosa forest
K019 Arizona pine forest
K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland
K037 Mountain-mahogany-oak scrub
K038 Great Basin sagebrush
K039 Blackbrush
K040 Saltbush-greasewood
K046 Desert: vegetation largely lacking
K053 Grama-galleta steppe
K055 Sagebrush steppe
K056 Wheatgrass-needlegrass shrubsteppe
K057 Galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe
K064 Grama-needlegrass-wheatgrass

SAF COVER TYPES [23]:
217 Aspen
220 Rocky Mountain juniper
237 Interior ponderosa pine
239 Pinyon-juniper

SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES [56]:
302 Bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg bluegrass
303 Bluebunch wheatgrass-western wheatgrass
310 Needle-and-thread-blue grama
314 Big sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass
317 Bitterbrush-bluebunch wheatgrass
320 Black sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass
322 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany-bluebunch wheatgrass
401 Basin big sagebrush
402 Mountain big sagebrush
403 Wyoming big sagebrush
404 Threetip sagebrush
405 Black sagebrush
406 Low sagebrush
408 Other sagebrush types
411 Aspen woodland
412 Juniper-pinyon woodland
413 Gambel oak
414 Salt desert shrub
415 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany
416 True mountain-mahogany
417 Littleleaf mountain-mahogany
419 Bittercherry
420 Snowbrush
421 Chokecherry-serviceberry-rose
501 Saltbush-greasewood
502 Grama-galleta
504 Juniper-pinyon pine woodland
509 Transition between oak-juniper woodland and mahogany-oak association

HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES:
Saline wildrye commonly occurs in salt desert shrub, desert shrub, sagebrush (Artemisia spp.)-grass, pinyon (Pinus spp.)-juniper (Juniperus spp.), mountain brush, ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa), and aspen (Populus tremuloides) communities [69].

Saline wildrye is often a dominant grass in Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii) and pinyon-juniper communities [19]. In Colorado pinyon (Pinus edulis) -Utah juniper (J. osteosperma) stands, saline wildrye occurs with black sagebrush (A. nova), plains prickly-pear (Opuntia polyacantha), Fremont's goosefoot (Chenopodium fremontii), nodding buckwheat (Eriogonum cernuum), and Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides) [27]. In singleleaf pinyon (P. monophylla)-Utah juniper/ Rocky Mountain juniper (J. scopulorum) it occurs with bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) and green rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) [37]. Other common species in pinyon-juniper communities include Ross' sedge (Carex rossii), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), needle-and-thread grass (Hesperostipa comata), galleta (Pleuraphis jamesii), mutton grass (Poa fendleriana), and Sandberg bluegrass (P. secunda) [61].

In true mountain-mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus) types, saline wildrye occurs with Fremont's goosefoot, nodding buckwheat, and Indian ricegrass [27]. In curlleaf mountain-mahogany (C. ledifolius) communities, common associates are Indian ricegrass, blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), and mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana) [60]. In the Great Basin desert shrub communities, saline wildrye is commonly found with winterfat (Krascheninnikovia lanata), Indian ricegrass, galleta, globemallow (Sphaeralcea spp.), spiny hopsage (Grayia spinosa), black sagebrush, budsage (A. spinescens), fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens), bottlebrush squirreltail, and dropseeds (Sporobolus spp.) [31].

Saline wildrye may codominate with Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis), shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), or Gardner's saltbush (A. gardneri) in Colorado [8,9].

Classifications identifying saline wildrye as a plant community dominant include the following:

Colorado [8]
Nevada
Utah [70]


BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Leymus salinus

GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
The following description of saline wildrye provides characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology, and is not meant for identification. Keys for identification are available (e.g. [10,19,68,69]).

Saline wildrye is a native perennial grass [10,19,33,69]. It grows in dense tufts that are mostly erect and 13 to 55 inches (35-140 cm) tall [10,19,69].

Saline wildrye leaves are primarily basal, 0.04 to 0.2 inch (1-5 mm) wide, and may be flat or more often strongly involute [10,19,22,69]. Leaves are glabrous to rarely pubescent [19,69]. The slender, erect spikes are 1.6 to 6 inches (4-15 cm) long and 0.1 to 0.3 inch (2.5-8 mm) wide [10,19,69]. Spikelets are usually solitary at nodes, but occasionally occur in pairs at some or all nodes [10,19,68]. Spikelets are 0.35 to 0.8 inch (9-20 mm) long with 2 to 6 flowers [10,19,69].

Saline wildrye is occasionally rhizomatous [10,69]. Rhizomes are generally stout and short [10,22,69], though they may also be well-developed [69]. Some controversy exists as to the consistency with which saline wildrye exhibits a rhizomatous growth habit. Cronquist and others [19] describe large saline wildrye bunches that give the appearance of being nonrhizomatous, especially when growing on heavy clay soils; however, under close inspection, short rhizomes are apparent.

RAUNKIAER [51] LIFE FORM:
Hemicryptophyte

REGENERATION PROCESSES:
Little information on the regeneration processes of saline wildrye is presently available, though it apparently employs both sexual and vegetative modes of reproduction [47].

Breeding system: No information is available on this topic.

Pollination: No information is available on this topic.

Seed production: Seed production of saline wildrye has been described as "good" [47].

Seed dispersal: When established by transplant, saline wildrye spreads readily by seeding [47].

Seed banking: No information is available on this topic.

Germination: No information is available on this topic.

Seedling establishment/growth: Limited information indicates that initial seedling establishment of saline wildrye is not highly successful due to the combined effects of low seed germination and poor seedling vigor. Once established, however, saline wildrye spreads readily, persists on a variety of sites [47,48] and grows rapidly [47].

Asexual regeneration: saline wildrye spreads readily through vegetative growth [47].

SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Saline wildrye is found on dry slopes, steep rocky mountainsides and flat to gently sloping benches, ridges, saddles, and plateaus [9,10,19,30,35,47,64,68,69]. Other typical sites include alkaline bluffs, washes, canyon sides, and alluvial fans [9]. Soils range from fine textured clays and loams [9,19,21,68] to coarse textured sand and rock [21,69], though growth is better on intermediate soil textures than on sands or clays [21]. Atkins and others [6] suggest that subspecies salmonis is adapted to more xeric sites than subspecies salinus. Saline wildrye is drought resistant and moderately tolerant of alkaline environments [9,19,47,64], though it rarely occurs on low-lying alkaline sites [69].

Though some authors report that saline wildrye is restricted to a narrow elevational range [37], it actually occurs from just over 4,000 feet to 10,000 feet (1,200-3,050 m), indicating a wide range of occurrence [9,21,30,34,35,69]. Elevational ranges for saline wildrye are presented by state below:

Arizona 5,000 feet (1,525 m) [35]
California 4,430-6,650 feet (1,350-2,000 m) [30]
Colorado 5,200-8,500 feet (1,585-2,590 m) [21]
Nevada 5,000-6,500 feet (1,525-1,980 m) [34]
Utah 4,990-10,000 feet (1,520-3,050 m) [21,69]
Wyoming 8,200 feet (2,500 m) [21]

SUCCESSIONAL STATUS:
Self-perpetuating stands of saline wildrye are characteristic of late successional or climax shrubland communities throughout the upper Colorado River Basin [9], though it is rarely found in pure stands [6].

SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT:
The phenological development of Salina wildrye has not been widely documented. Flowering occurs from May through July [21].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Leymus salinus
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS:
Fire adaptations: According to a review by Bradley and others [16], Saline wildrye can survive fire via its root crown and rhizomes [16]. However, no experimental evidence is available.

Fire regimes: Little is known regarding the specific relationship between saline wildrye and fire. Saline wildrye rarely occurs in pure stands [6]; it is generally found as a minor or occasionally dominant component of several plant communities. Fire return intervals for plant communities and ecosystems in which saline wildrye occurs are summarized below. Find further fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find Fire Regimes".

Community or Ecosystem Dominant Species Fire Return Interval Range (years)
silver sagebrush steppe Artemisia cana 5-45 [29,49,72]
sagebrush steppe Artemisia tridentata/Pseudoroegneria spicata 20-70 [45]
basin big sagebrush Artemisia tridentata var. tridentata 12-43 [53]
mountain big sagebrush Artemisia tridentata var. vaseyana 15-40 [3,17,44]
Wyoming big sagebrush Artemisia tridentata var. wyomingensis 10-70 (40**) [65,73]
saltbush-greasewood Atriplex confertifolia-Sarcobatus vermiculatus < 35 to < 100
desert grasslands Bouteloua eriopoda and/or Pleuraphis mutica 5-100 [45]
plains grasslands Bouteloua spp. < 35 [45,72]
blue grama-needle-and-thread grass-western wheatgrass Bouteloua gracilis-Hesperostipa comata-Pascopyrum smithii < 35 [45,52,72]
blue grama-buffalo grass Bouteloua gracilis-Buchloe dactyloides < 35 [45,72]
grama-galleta steppe Bouteloua gracilis-Pleuraphis jamesii < 35 to < 100
blue grama-tobosa prairie Bouteloua gracilis-Pleuraphis mutica < 35 to < 100 [45]
cheatgrass Bromus tectorum < 10 [46,71]
curlleaf mountain-mahogany* Cercocarpus ledifolius 13-1,000 [5,54]
mountain-mahogany-Gambel oak scrub Cercocarpus ledifolius-Quercus gambelii < 35 to < 100
blackbrush Coleogyne ramosissima < 35 to < 100
Arizona cypress Cupressus arizonica < 35 to 200
western juniper Juniperus occidentalis 20-70
Rocky Mountain juniper Juniperus scopulorum < 35 [45]
wheatgrass plains grasslands Pascopyrum smithii < 5-47+ [45,49,72]
pinyon-juniper Pinus-Juniperus spp. < 35 [45]
Rocky Mountain lodgepole pine* Pinus contorta var. latifolia 25-340 [11,12,59]
Colorado pinyon Pinus edulis 10-400+ [24,26,36,45]
Jeffrey pine Pinus jeffreyi 5-30 [2]
interior ponderosa pine* Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum 2-30 [2,7,40]
Arizona pine Pinus ponderosa var. arizonica 2-15 [7,18,55]
galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe Pleuraphis jamesii-Aristida purpurea < 35 to < 100 [45]
quaking aspen (west of the Great Plains) Populus tremuloides 7-120 [2,28,43]
mesquite Prosopis glandulosa < 35 to < 100 [42,45]
mesquite-buffalo grass Prosopis glandulosa-Buchloe dactyloides < 35 [45]
mountain grasslands Pseudoroegneria spicata 3-40 (10**) [1,2]
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir* Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca 25-100 [2,3,4]
oak-juniper woodland (Southwest) Quercus-Juniperus spp. < 35 to < 200 [45]
oak savanna Quercus macrocarpa/Andropogon gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 2-14 [45,67]
little bluestem-grama prairie Schizachyrium scoparium-Bouteloua spp. < 35 [45]
*fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species review
**mean

POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [58]:
Rhizomatous herb, rhizome in soil
Caudex/herbaceous root crown, growing points in soil
Ground residual colonizer (on-site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on-site or off-site seed sources)

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Leymus salinus
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT:
Though saline wildrye is presumably top-killed by fire, little information exists in the literature concerning the effects of fire on saline wildrye.

DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT:
No additional information is available on this topic.

PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE:
Saline wildrye's response to fire is poorly documented, though a review by Bradley and others [16] states it generally has a surviving root crown and rhizomes. Basin wildrye (L. cinereus), another cool-season bunchgrass native to the western United States, exhibits growth form similar to that of saline wildrye, establishing dense culms reaching nearly 6 feet (2 m) tall. Basin wildrye displays the same fire survival strategy, so its response to fire may offer insight into saline wildrye's response to fire. Basin wildrye has high survival rates following fire due to resprouting from the surviving root crown and rhizomes [15,38,50]. It recovers rapidly, especially after dormant-season fires [15]. For more information regarding fire effects and plant response of basin wildrye , see the FEIS species summary. The extent to which this information can be applied to saline wildrye is unknown, and more research is needed regarding both the effect of fire on saline wildrye and its response to fire.

DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE:
No additional information is available on this topic.

FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
No additional information is available on this topic.

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

SPECIES: Leymus salinus
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE:
Little information is available concerning livestock and wildlife utilization of saline wildrye, though it is utilized by domestic sheep [31] and presumably other grazing animals. Because it grows in dense bunches, the quantity of forage produced by saline wildrye is moderately high [64].

Palatability/nutritional value: Saline wildrye provides a moderate amount of fair quality, coarse forage during the growing season, but is unpalatable when mature and dried [64,69]. Palatability has been rated poor to good for sheep and fair to good for cattle and horses [21]. The following table presents nutritional information of saline wildrye sampled in Utah [57]:

Cal./kg % protein % carbohydrate % fat % ash % moisture
2,750 12.5 55.9 0.60 24.1 6.9

Cover value: Saline wildrye cover value has been rated poor to fair for mule deer, poor to good for upland game birds, and fair to good for small nongame birds and small mammals [21].

VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES:
Saline wildrye may be useful for revegetating burned [6] or otherwise disturbed areas [47]. It establishes moderately well from transplants, and will spread by seed once established [47]. Saline wildrye is valuable for soil stabilization on steep, erosive clay hillsides [64].

OTHER USES:
No information is available on this topic.

OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
Field trials in the eastern Central Great Plains demonstrated that Saline wildrye has high survivability and forage production potential, perhaps indicating usefulness in livestock production [66]. However, excessive livestock grazing may decrease saline wildrye success [9].

Saline wildrye increases in density following shrub overstory removal [60].


REFERENCES:


1. Arno, Stephen F. 1980. Forest fire history in the Northern Rockies. Journal of Forestry. 78(8): 460-465. [11990]
2. Arno, Stephen F. 2000. Fire in western forest ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 97-120. [36984]
3. Arno, Stephen F.; Gruell, George E. 1983. Fire history at the forest-grassland ecotone in southwestern Montana. Journal of Range Management. 36(3): 332-336. [342]
4. Arno, Stephen F.; Scott, Joe H.; Hartwell, Michael G. 1995. Age-class structure of old growth ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir stands and its relationship to fire history. Res. Pap. INT-RP-481. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 25 p. [25928]
5. Arno, Stephen F.; Wilson, Andrew E. 1986. Dating past fires in curlleaf mountain-mahogany communities. Journal of Range Management. 39(3): 241-243. [350]
6. Atkins, Riley J.; Barkworth, Mary E.; Dewey, Douglas R. 1984. A taxonomic study of Leymus ambiguus and L. salinus (Poaceae: Triticeae). Systematic Botany. 9(3): 279-294. [2851]
7. Baisan, Christopher H.; Swetnam, Thomas W. 1990. Fire history on a desert mountain range: Rincon Mountain Wilderness, Arizona, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 20: 1559-1569. [14986]
8. Baker, William L. 1984. A preliminary classification of the natural vegetation of Colorado. The Great Basin Naturalist. 44(4): 647-676. [380]
9. Baker, William L.; Kennedy, Susan C. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. The Great Basin Naturalist. 45(4): 747-783. [384]
10. Barkworth, Mary E.; Atkins, Riley J. 1984. Leymus Hochst. (Gramineae: Triticeae) in North America: taxonomy and distribution. American Journal of Botany. 71(5): 609-625. [2889]
11. Barrett, Stephen W. 1993. Fire regimes on the Clearwater and Nez Perce National Forests north-central Idaho. Final Report: Order No. 43-0276-3-0112. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Unpublished report on file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 21 p. [41883]
12. Barrett, Stephen W.; Arno, Stephen F. 1991. Classifying fire regimes and defining their topographic controls in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness. In: Andrews, Patricia L.; Potts, Donald F., eds. Proceedings, 11th annual conference on fire and forest meteorology; 1991 April 16-19; Missoula, MT. SAF Publication 91-04. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters: 299-307. [16179]
13. Barrett, Stephen W.; Arno, Stephen F.; Key, Carl H. 1991. Fire regimes of western larch - lodgepole pine forests in Glacier National Park, Montana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 21(12): 1711-1720. [17290]
14. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
15. Bradley, Anne F.; Fischer, William C.; Noste, Nonan V. 1992. Fire ecology of the forest habitat types of eastern Idaho and western Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-290. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 92 p. [19557]
16. Bradley, Anne F.; Noste, Nonan V.; Fischer, William C. 1992. Fire ecology of forests and woodlands in Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-287. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 128 p. [18211]
17. Burkhardt, Wayne J.; Tisdale, E. W. 1976. Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology. 57(3): 472-484. [565]
18. Cooper, Charles F. 1961. Pattern in ponderosa pine forests. Ecology. 42(3): 493-499. [5780]
19. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; Reveal, James L.; Holmgren, Patricia K. 1977. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 6: The Monocotyledons. New York: Columbia University Press. 584 p. [719]
20. Davis, Kathleen M. 1980. Fire history of a western larch/Douglas-fir forest type in northwestern Montana. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 69-74. [12813]
21. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The Plant Information Network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
22. Dorn, Robert D. 1988. Vascular plants of Wyoming. Cheyenne, WY: Mountain West Publishing. 340 p. [6129]
23. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
24. Floyd, M. Lisa; Romme, William H.; Hanna, David D. 2000. Fire history and vegetation pattern in Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado, USA. Ecological Applications. 10(6): 1666-1680. [37590]
25. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; Lewis, Mont E.; Smith, Dixie R. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
26. Gottfried, Gerald J.; Swetnam, Thomas W.; Allen, Craig D.; Betancourt, Julio L.; Chung-MacCoubrey, Alice L. 1995. Pinyon-juniper woodlands. In: Finch, Deborah M.; Tainter, Joseph A., eds. Ecology, diversity, and sustainability of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-268. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 95-132. [26188]
27. Greenwood, Larry R.; Brotherson, Jack D. 1978. Ecological relationships between pinyon-juniper and true mountain mahogany stands in the Uintah Basin, Utah. Journal of Range Management. 31(3): 164-167. [15654]
28. Gruell, G. E.; Loope, L. L. 1974. Relationships among aspen, fire, and ungulate browsing in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. In cooperation with: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Region. [3862]
29. Heyerdahl, Emily K.; Berry, Dawn; Agee, James K. 1994. Fire history database of the western United States. Final report. Interagency agreement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency DW12934530; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service PNW-93-0300; University of Washington 61-2239. Seattle, WA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station; University of Washington, College of Forest Resources. 28 p. [+ appendices]. Unpublished report on file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [27979]
30. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
31. Hutchings, Selar S.; Stewart, George. 1953. Increasing forage yields and sheep production on Intermountain winter ranges. Circular No. 925. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 63 p. [1227]
32. Jensen, Kevin B.; Redinbaugh, M.; Blood, M.; Horton, W. H.; Asay, K. H. 1999. Natural hybrids of Elymus elymoides x Leymus salinus subsp. salmonis (Poaceae: Triticeae). Crop Science. 39(4): 976-982. [35162]
33. Kartesz, John T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 1st ed. In: Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Botanical Garden (Producer). In cooperation with: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. [36715]
34. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. Dissertation. [In 2 volumes]. [42426]
35. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
36. Keeley, Jon E. 1981. Reproductive cycles and fire regimes. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; Lotan, J. E.; Reiners, W. A., tech. coords. Fire regimes and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 231-277. [4395]
37. Kitchen, Stanley G.; McArthur, E. Durant; Jorgensen, Gary L. 1999. Species richness and community structure along a Great Basin elevational gradient. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Ostler, W. Kent; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings: shrubland ecotones; 1998 August 12-14; Ephraim, UT. Proceedings RMRS-P-11. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 59-65. [36063]
38. Klebenow, D.; Beall, R.; Bruner, A.; Mason, R.; Roundy, B.; Stager, W.; Ward, K. 1977. Controlled fire as a management tool in the pinyon-juniper woodland, Nevada. Summary Progress Report: FY 1977. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Agricultural Experiment Station. 155 p. In cooperation with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [35528]
39. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. United States: Map, [Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States]. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 1:3,168,000; colored. [3455]
40. Laven, R. D.; Omi, P. N.; Wyant, J. G.; Pinkerton, A. S. 1980. Interpretation of fire scar data from a ponderosa pine ecosystem in the central Rocky Mountains, Colorado. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 46-49. [7183]
41. Love, Askell. 1980. Poaceae-Triticeae-americanae. Taxon. 29: 166-169. [5907]
42. McPherson, Guy R. 1995. The role of fire in the desert grasslands. In: McClaran, Mitchel P.; Van Devender, Thomas R., eds. The desert grassland. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press: 130-151. [26576]
43. Meinecke, E. P. 1929. Quaking aspen: A study in applied forest pathology. Tech. Bull. No. 155. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 34 p. [26669]
44. Miller, Richard F.; Rose, Jeffery A. 1995. Historic expansion of Juniperus occidentalis (western juniper) in southeastern Oregon. The Great Basin Naturalist. 55(1): 37-45. [25666]
45. Paysen, Timothy E.; Ansley, R. James; Brown, James K.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Haase, Sally M.; Harrington, Michael G.; Narog, Marcia G.; Sackett, Stephen S.; Wilson, Ruth C. 2000. Fire in western shrubland, woodland, and grassland ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 121-159. [36978]
46. Peters, Erin F.; Bunting, Stephen C. 1994. Fire conditions pre-and post-occurrence of annual grasses on the Snake River Plain. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., comps. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 31-36. [24249]
47. Plummer, A. Perry. 1977. Revegetation of disturbed Intermountain area sites. In: Thames, J. C., ed. Reclamation and use of disturbed lands of the Southwest. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press: 302-337. [27411]
48. Plummer, A. Perry; Christensen, Donald R.; Monsen, Stephen B. 1968. Restoring big-game range in Utah. Publ. No. 68-3. Ephraim, UT: Utah Division of Fish and Game. 183 p. [4554]
49. Quinnild, Clayton L.; Cosby, Hugh E. 1958. Relicts of climax vegetation on two mesas in western North Dakota. Ecology. 39(1): 29-32. [1925]
50. Range, Phil; Veisze, Paul; Beyer, Cheryl; Zschaechner, Greg. 1982. Great Basin rate-of-spread study: Fire behavior/fire effects. Reno, Nevada: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office, Branch of Protection. 56 p. [1935]
51. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
52. Rowe, J. S. 1969. Lightning fires in Saskatchewan grassland. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 83: 317-324. [6266]
53. Sapsis, David B. 1990. Ecological effects of spring and fall prescribed burning on basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue--bluebunch wheatgrass communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 105 p. Thesis. [16579]
54. Schultz, Brad W. 1987. Ecology of curlleaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius) in western and central Nevada: population structure and dynamics. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 111 p. Thesis. [7064]
55. Seklecki, Mariette T.; Grissino-Mayer, Henri D.; Swetnam, Thomas W. 1996. Fire history and the possible role of Apache-set fires in the Chiricahua Mountains of southeastern Arizona. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; DeBano, Leonard F.; Baker, Malchus B., Jr.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Solis-Garza, Gilberto; Edminster, Carleton B.; Neary, Daniel G.; Allen, Larry S.; Hamre, R. H., tech. coords. Effects of fire on Madrean Province ecosystems: a symposium proceedings; 1996 March 11-15; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-289. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 238-246. [28082]
56. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]
57. Simms, Steven R. 1985. Acquisition cost and nutritional data on Great Basin resources. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology. 7(1): 117-126. [267]
58. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species comprising secondary plant succession in northern Rocky Mountain forests. FEIS workshop: Postfire regeneration. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 10 p. [20090]
59. Tande, Gerald F. 1979. Fire history and vegetation pattern of coniferous forests in Jasper National Park, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany. 57: 1912-1931. [18676]
60. Thompson, Robert M. 1990. The long-term response of curlleaf mountain mahogany to top pruning in south central Utah. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Proceedings, 5th Utah shrub ecology workshop: The genus Cercocarpus; 1988 July 13-14; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of Natural Resources: 75-88. [16098]
61. Thompson, Robert M. 1999. An example of pinyon-juniper woodland classification in southeastern Utah. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Stevens, Richard, compilers. Proceedings: ecology and management of pinyon-juniper communities within the Interior West: Sustaining and restoring a diverse ecosystem; 1997 September 15-18; Provo, UT. Proceedings RMRS-P-9. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 60-63. [30492]
62. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017. PLANTS Database, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: https://plants.usda.gov/. [34262]
63. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. 1998. Inventory of sensitive species and ecosystems in Utah--Endemic and rare plants of Utah: an overview of their distribution and status. Central Utah Project Completion Act: Title III, Section 306(b); Cooperative Agreement No. UC-95-0015: Section V.A.10.a. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Reclamation, Mitigation and Conservation Commission. 566 p. (+ appendices). [42066]
64. Vallentine, John F. 1961. Important Utah range grasses. Extension Circular 281. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 48 p. [2937]
65. Vincent, Dwain W. 1992. The sagebrush/grasslands of the upper Rio Puerco area, New Mexico. Rangelands. 14(5): 268-271. [19698]
66. Vogel, Kenneth P.; Jensen, Kevin J. 2001. Adaptation of perennial Triticeae to the eastern central Great Plains. Journal of Range Management. 54(6): 674-679. [40784]
67. Wade, Dale D.; Brock, Brent L.; Brose, Patrick H.; Grace, James B.; Hoch, Greg A.; Patterson, William A., III. 2000. Fire in eastern ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 53-96. [36983]
68. Weber, William A. 1987. Colorado flora: western slope. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associated University Press. 530 p. [7706]
69. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
70. West, Neil E.; Tausch, Robin J.; Tueller, Paul T. 1998. A management-oriented classification of pinyon-juniper woodlands of the Great Basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-12. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 42 p. [29131]
71. Whisenant, Steven G. 1990. Postfire population dynamics of Bromus japonicus. The American Midland Naturalist. 123: 301-308. [11150]
72. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
73. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1981. Demography and fire history of a western juniper stand. Journal of Range Management. 34(6): 501-505. [2659]

https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/leysal/all.html