Skip to main content

Future Forests, Water, and Quality of Life in Northeastern Minnesota

Alternative future scenarios for northeastern Minnesota, as defined by two primary axes [increasing financial security from left to right, and decreasing coordinated action with respect to climate change (CC) from top to bottom]. Each scenario is represented by a brief phrase and animal metaphor designed to convey the essence of the scenario to stakeholders.

It is difficult to accurately envision the future, especially when considering the complex interplay among forests, water, urban centers, and people. Scientists worked with local stakeholders to develop scenarios to guide landscape modeling of four distinct possible futures for forests, water, and people in and around Duluth, MN.

Most people envision the future as an extension of their past experience, but there are many plausible alternative futures that may radically differ from the past. Northern Research Station scientists conducted a series of virtual stakeholder engagement sessions with over 80 participants from northeastern Minnesota to develop four scenarios depicting different futures for a large, multiple county watershed feeding into Lake Superior. The watershed includes a rural-to-urban gradient extending north and west from Duluth, where the majority of forests are actively managed by diverse public, private, and tribal entities.

Scenarios were designed with input from stakeholders on issues that are both highly uncertain and are likely to have a significant impact on the forest ecosystems and the communities they support. As a first step in scenario development, stakeholders were asked to rate a series of issues for importance and uncertainty. The two highest rated issues were financial security of individuals and communities, and policy to address climate change; these served as the two axes around which four starkly different future scenarios were built. In parallel, scientists developed a baseline scenario derived from recent trends in the LANDIS-II modeling framework. The alternative future scenarios and baseline model were presented back to stakeholders for further input and refinement. These model outputs will be useful in guiding decisions as land managers aim to achieve desired future conditions. The goal is to support current-day planning by providing a glimpse of what could come.

Contacts

Publications

  • https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/sustaining_forests/monitoring_assessment/alternative_watershed_scenarios/
  • https://whova.com/embedded/session/inaac_202104/1540575/
  • https://whova.com/embedded/session/inaac_202104/1540562/ (Other Products heading??)

Forest Service Partners

  • Dan Ryan,
  • James McFarland,
  • Cheron Ferland, Affiliation?? Chequamegon-Nicolet NF??

External Partners

  • Jason Crabtree [formerly University of Minnesota (UMN), now Cofutura]
  • Joshua Plisinski and Jonathan Thompson (Harvard Forest)
  • Diana Karwan and Zac McEachran (UMN)
  • John DuPliss (UM-Duluth)
  • Michael Dockry (UMN)
  • Forrest Fleischman (UMN)
  • Minnesota Forest Resources Council
https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/highlights/2021/2187