Index of Species Information
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
|
![](habitat.jpg) |
Gray pine at the Red Hills Endangered Environmental Area, Tuolumne County, CA. Image ©2012 Jean Pawek. |
Introductory
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Howard, Janet L. 1992. Pinus sabiniana. In: Fire Effects Information
System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/tree/pinsab/all.html [].
ABBREVIATION :
PINSAB
SYNONYMS :
None
SCS PLANT CODE :
PISA2
COMMON NAMES :
gray pine
California foothill pine
foothills pine
bull pine
TAXONOMY :
The scientific name for gray pine is Pinus sabiniana Dougl. [36,39].
There are no infrataxa [40].
LIFE FORM :
Tree
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Gray pine is endemic to California. It is distributed from Siskiyou
County south through the foothills of the Klamath, Cascade, and Coast
Ranges and the Sierra Nevada to Ventura County [23,39,40]. Near its
southernmost Sierra Nevada limit, gray pine is absent from a 55-mile
(89-km) stretch between Kings River and the South Fork of the Tule River
[23].
![](map.JPG) |
Distribution of gray pine. 1971 USDA, Forest Service map digitized by Thompson and others [52]. |
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES20 Douglas-fir
FRES21 Ponderosa pine
FRES27 Redwood
FRES28 Western hardwoods
FRES29 Sagebrush
FRES34 Chaparral - mountain shrub
FRES35 Pinyon - juniper
FRES42 Annual grasslands
STATES :
CA
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
3 Southern Pacific Border
4 Sierra Mountains
7 Lower Basin and Range
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K005 Mixed conifer forest
K006 Redwood forest
K009 Pine - cypress forest
K010 Ponderosa shrub forest
K011 Western ponderosa forest
K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland
K024 Juniper steppe woodland
K028 Mosaic of K002 and K026
K029 California mixed evergreen forest
K030 California oakwoods
K033 Chaparral
K034 Montane chaparral
K035 Coastal sagebrush
K038 Great Basin sagebrush
K048 California steppe
SAF COVER TYPES :
233 Oregon white oak
234 Douglas-fir - tanoak - Pacific madrone
238 Western juniper
239 Pinyon - juniper
244 Pacific ponderosa pine - Douglas-fir
245 Pacific ponderosa pine
246 California black oak
247 Jeffrey pine
248 Knobcone pine
249 Canyon live oak
250 Blue oak - gray pine
255 California coast live oak
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Gray pine and blue oak (Quercus douglasii) occur together over much of
California's oak woodlands. The blue oak-gray pine community varies in
stand density and composition, often sharing dominance with several
other tree species. The understory may be mostly grasses, shrubs, or
mixtures of both [16]. Pure stands of gray pine occur in localized
areas of serpentine soil [21], but more often, blue oak provides more
cover within the community type. At lower elevations, the blue oak-gray
pine woodland grades into chaparral, valley oak (Q. lobata) woodland, or
Oregon white oak (Q. garryana) woodland. At higher elevations, it mixes
with California black oak (Q. kelloggii) or ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosa) forest [16,26]. In its easternmost distribution, gray pine
merges with desert communities such as western juniper (Juniperus
occidentalis) and big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) near the Great
Basin and singleleaf pinyon (P. monophylla)-California juniper (J.
californica) near the Mojave Desert [16].
Plant associates: Overstory associates not mentioned in Habitat Types
and Plant Communities or SAF Cover Types include Coulter pine (P.
coulteri), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), interior live oak
(Quercus wislizenii), bigcone Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga macrocarpa), and
MacNab cypress (Cupressus macnabiana) [3,11,18,26,43].
Common shrub associates include toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia),
wedgeleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus cuneatus), chamise (Adenostoma
fasciculatum), California scrub oak (Q. dumosa), desert scrub oak (Q.
turbinella), California buckthorn (Rhamnus californicus), common
manzanita (Arctostaphylos manzanita), birchleaf mountain-mahogany
(Cercocarpus betuloides), poison-oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum),
Sargent cypress (Cupressus sargentii), and hollyleaf cherry (Prunus
ilicifolia) [2,3,11,24,26].
Common ground associates include slender oat (Avena barbata), California
buckwheat (Erigonum fasciculatum), soft chess (Bruomus hordeaceus),
ripgut brome (B. rigidus), cutleaf filaree (Erodium cicutarium), bur
clover (Medicago hispida), ground lupine (Lupinus bicolor), and tarweed
(Hemizonia spp.) [3,8,24].
Publications listing gray pine as a dominant or codominant species are
as follows:
A classification system for California's hardwood rangelands [2]
Blue oak communities in California [3]
Association types in the North Coast Ranges of California [12]
Natural terrestrial communities of California [26]
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
Gray pine wood has minor commercial value. It is used for making
railroad ties, box shook, pallet stock, and chips. Poor form, high
resin content, and high proportions of compression wood result in low
stumpage prices. The mechanical strength properties of the wood have
been detailed [49]. Gray pine is expensive to log due to low stand
density [40].
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
The blue oak-gray pine community is preferred habitat for black-tailed
deer, California quail, and mourning dove [9]. Gray pine seeds are an
important diet item for various birds and rodents. Scrub jay, acorn
woodpecker, and California gray squirrel are major seed consumers [40].
Livestock also eat the seeds. High concentrations of resins and
terpenes render gray pine browse unpalatable [42].
PALATABILITY :
NO-ENTRY
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
The percent composition of gray pine seeds is as follows [47]:
protein 25.0
fat 49.4
carbohydrate 17.5
Kcal/100 g 571
The concentrations of several essential minerals in gray pine seeds
are available [47].
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
Gray pine has been planted on a limited basis for erosion control.
Commercial nursery stock is unavailable. Seedlings have been
established on rehabilitation sites by planting 1- or 2-year-old
bareroot stock grown from locally collected seed [27,29]. Gray pine
is an appropriate choice for planting in soils with calcium imbalances.
It will grow well on both serpentine soil, where calcium is deficient,
and on limestone soil, where calcium is abundant. In addition, it will
grow on xeric sites where establishment of other tree species is
difficult [40].
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
Gray pine seeds were important in the diet of California Indians [40].
OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Gray pine is considered an undesirable weed tree by many rangeland
managers. Production and quality of forage growing under gray pine is
less than that growing under blue oak. Additionally, gray pine provides
little shade for livestock during hot summer months [13,22,40]. It has
been extensively cut within the last century in order to clear rangeland
areas [40].
Diseases: Prominent diseases of gray pine include western gall rust
(Periderium harknessii) and dwarf-mistletoe (Arceuthobium occidentale
and A. campylopodum forma campylopodum) [1,20,31,40]. Western gall rust
forms galls on gray pine throughout its range but rarely causes serious
damage. Dwarf-mistletoe is a particularly damaging and widespread
disease [40]. It infects trees of all ages, causing reduced tree vigor
or death. Left uncontrolled, infection can increase sixty-fold within
10 years [20]. Arceuthobium occidentale also infects Douglas-fir
(Pseudotsuga menziezii) and bigcone Douglas-fir, while A. campylopodum
forma campylopodum can infect Coulter, Jeffrey (Pinus jeffreyi),
Monterey (P. radiata), and ponderosa pines [20,31]. Dwarf-mistletoe is
controlled by cutting infected trees or removing infected branches [31].
Gray pine is the specific host for Ips spinifer. This bark beetle
generally attacks fire- or drought-weakened trees. Heavy resin
production by healthy trees provides a strong defense against most
species of bark beetles. Gray pine is host to a variety of cone, twig,
and foliage insects, but the damage they cause is usually minor [40].
Gray pine growing in hardpan is susceptible to windthrow under
waterlogged soil conditions [40].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Gray pine is a drought-tolerant, native evergreen conifer. Mature
trees average from 40 to 80 feet (12-24 m) in height and from 12 to 36
inches (30-90 cm) in d.b.h. [38,40]. Trees usually maintain a pyrimidal
growth form until the pole stage. Mature trees typically have multiple
trunks [40]. Gray pine is self-pruning, and lower branches are often
a considerable distance above the understory [35]. Gray pine grows a
deep taproot where soil depth permits [4,40]. In hardpan soils, it
develops a spreading, shallow root system with a weak taproot extending
through the duripan [40]. The bark of young trees is thin [40], while
older trees have thick bark [35]. Needles grow from 8 to 12 inches
(20-30 cm) long and are shed every 2 to 3 years [39]. Gray pine's
heavily spined female cones are among the largest and most massive in
the genus. Fresh cones average from 0.7 to 1.5 pounds (0.3-0.7 k), and
may exceed 2.2 pounds (1 kg) [40]. The cones are typically from 6 to 12
inches (15-30 cm) long. They do not form an abscission layer and are
retained long after seeds are shed. The hard-coated, heavy seeds are
from 0.6 to 1.0 inch (15-25 mm) long and have short-winged seeds
[17,38,39]. The lifespan of gray pine is unclear because most older
specimens were cut by early settlers, but it is believed to be 200+
years [40].
![](cones.jpg) |
Gray pine cones. Creative Commons image by Keir Morse. |
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Phanerophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Gray pine produces seed at 10 to 25 years of age [33]. It is a
consistent seed producer, with large crop outputs at 2- to 3-year
intervals [40]. Gray pine has delayed seed dispersal [10,46]. Cones
open slowly, shedding seed over a period of several months [40]. Seeds
are disseminated by animals, gravity, and water [1,40]. Scrub jay and
acorn woodpecker are the most effective animal disseminators [40].
Seeds require cold stratification for approximately 30 days prior to
germination [27,33]. The exact stratification period varies with
ecotype. Seedbank-stored seed remains viable for up to 5 years [33].
Germination rates improve when the seed is scarified and increase
greatly when the nuclear cap is removed [40,48]. Germination is epigeal
[33]. Seedlings establish best on bare mineral soil under partial
shade. Most first-year growth occurs in the taproot. Subsequent top
growth is rapid; early growth rates of gray pine are among the most
rapid of all conifers. Rate of top growth averages 28 inches (70 cm)
per year for the first 8 years of life [40].
Gray pine does not reproduce vegetatively [40].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Gray pine grows on exposed, dry, rocky slopes at elevations from 100
to 6,000 feet (30-1,800 m) [23,26]. The climate is Mediterranean, with
mild winters and hot, dry summers [35]. Annual mean precipitation is 21
inches (530 mm), ranging from 3 to 40 inches (76-1,000 mm) [6,40].
Eighty percent of precipitation occurs during winter and early spring.
Snow falls occasionally [35]. The annual mean temperature is 61 degrees
Fahrenheit (16 deg C), with maximum summer temperatures sometimes above
105 degrees Fahrenheit (41 deg C) [6,9]. Relative humidity is often 5
percent or lower in summer [9].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Blue oak-gray pine communities are fire climax and are replaced by
ponderosa pine or other coniferous forests in the absence of fire
[16,26,32]. Gray pine readily establishes from seed on disturbed sites
and is common in all seral stages of the blue oak-gray pine community
[30]. Young trees tolerate partial shade [40]. Mature trees are shade
intolerant [25].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
The seasonal development of gray pine is as follows:
growth starts: March to April [35]
pollination: March to April [15,40]
fertilization: Spring following pollination [40]
cones mature: September to October [40]
seeds dispersed: October to February [40]
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Fire is a natural component of the blue oak-gray pine community [1].
Historically, these woodlands burned at 15- to 30-year intervals [1].
Fires were typically intense but of light or moderate severity, with
vegetation and fuels extremely dry in summer [9,28]. Researchers at the
San Joaquin Experimental Range in O'Neals, California, noted fire
surface temperatures near woody vegetation of 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit
(650 deg C) in a blue oak-gray pine community with a mixed-grass and
sparse brush understory [28]. A prescribed fire in a blue oak-gray pine
community in Glenville, Kern County, generated subsurface temperatures
of 156 degrees Fahrenheit (69 deg C) at a depth of 2 inches (0.8 cm)
below ground [35].
Gray pine is highly flammable. The needles contain ether extracts
[5]. It is a heavy resin producer, with the wood, bark, cones, and
needle sheaths all containing pitch [35,40]. Congealed flows of resin
that have dripped from wounds are common on gray pine. Consequently,
it is susceptible to fire damage [40].
Gray pine has two adaptations which enable it to survive fire. First,
some large trees will withstand moderate-severity fire. Mature trees
with thick bark and self-pruned trunks are best able to avoid fatal
scorching [35]. Secondly, seed regeneration is favored following fire.
Fire creates a favorable bare mineral soil seedbed, and heat
scarification of the woody seedcoat increases germination rates [40].
FIRE REGIMES :
Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this
species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under
"Find Fire Regimes".
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Tree without adventitious-bud root crown
Ground residual colonizer (on-site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer - on-site seed
Secondary colonizer - off-site seed
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Moderate-severity fire kills a substantial number of gray pine. The
prescribed fire in Glenville (see Fire Ecology or Adaptations) killed 83
percent of gray pine present. All surviving gray pine were large trees
[35].
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
Information regarding postfire recovery of gray pine is sparse. Keeley
[30] reported a gray pine seedling density of 133 per acre (54/ha)
following a wildfire of unreported severity at Bartlett Springs, Lake
County. Percentage cover provided by gray pine in a blue oak-gray pine
community often decreases when fires are frequent. Many blue oak
ecotypes sprout following fire, and under a regime of frequent fire,
rapidly growing blue oak sprouts interfere with gray pine seedling
growth [16,26].
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Gray pine is increasing in blue oak-gray pine communities due to fire
suppression and lack of blue oak regeneration [14]. Rangeland managers
are reporting an increase of chaparral brush invading grassy
understories of blue oak-gray pine woodlands, also because of fire
suppression [8]. Timber species are invading the woodlands as well
[26]. Prescribed burning would help restore the blue oak-gray pine
community to a more desirable species balance. Managers, however,
should be alerted to the regeneration capacity of blue oak ecotypes
within their area. See the blue oak FEIS write-up for further
information.
Fire managers recommend broadcast burning of blue oak-gray pine
woodlands in spring after grasses have dried, usually late May, or in
fall after the first rains. Fires are set with drip torches and
permitted to burn downslope. There should be little or no wind.
Recommended relative humidity range during spring is 30 to 35 percent;
recommended ambient air temperature is between 70 to 80 degrees
Fahrenheit (21-27 deg C). In fall, recommended relative humidity is 25
to 30 percent. Fall temperatures of 70 to 75 degrees Fahrenheit (21-24
deg C) are suggested [1].
If the woodlands contain a chaparral understory, upslope strip burning
during winter and early spring is recommended. At this time, chaparral
brush is fully green and grass shoots are from 2 to 3 inches (0.8-1.2
cm) high. Acceptable ranges of humidity are from 25 to 30 percent;
acceptable temperature ranges are from 70 to 75 degrees Fahrenheit
(21-24 deg C) [1].
Dwarf-mistletoe is eliminated from an infected area following a
stand-replacing fire [31].
Bark beetles (Arhopalus asperatus) have been observed attacking severely
scorched gray pine within hours following fire [45].
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Pinus sabiniana
REFERENCES :
1. Agee, James K.; Biswell, Harold H. 1978. The fire management plan for
Pinnacles National Monument. In: Proceedings, 1st conference on
scientific research in the National Parks; [Date of conference unknown];
[Location of conference unknown]. [Place of publication unknown].
[Publisher unknown]. 1231-1238. [14368]
2. Allen, Barbara H.; Holzman, Barbara A.; Evett, Rand R. 1991. A
classification system for California's hardwood rangelands. Hilgardia.
59(2): 1-45. [17371]
3. Allen-Diaz, Barbara H.; Holzman, Barbara A. 1991. Blue oak communities
in California. Madrono. 38(2): 80-95. [15424]
4. Arno, Stephen F.; Hammerly, Ramona P. 1984. Timberline: Mountain and
arctic forest frontiers. Seattle, WA: The Mountaineers. 304 p. [339]
5. Bailey, Lowell F. 1948. Leaf oils from Tennessee Valley conifers.
Journal of Forestry. 46(12): 882-889. [13265]
6. Barbour, Michael G. 1988. Californian upland forests and woodlands. In:
Barbour, Michael G.; Billings, William Dwight, eds. North American
terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press:
131-164. [13880]
7. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
8. Biswell, H. H. 1956. Ecology of California grasslands. Journal of
Forestry. 9: 19-24. [11182]
9. Biswell, H. H. 1963. Research in wildland fire ecology in California.
In: Proceedings, 2nd annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1963
March 14-15; Tallahassee, FL. No. 2. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers
Research Station: 63-97. [13474]
10. Borchert, Mark. 1985. Serotiny and cone-habit variation in populations
of Pinus coulteri (Pinaceae) in the southern Coast Ranges of California.
Madrono. 32(1): 29-48. [5997]
11. Childers, Christian A.; Piirto, Douglas D. 1991. Cost-effective
wilderness fire management: a case study in southern California. In:
Nodvin, Stephen C.; Waldrop, Thomas A., eds. Fire and the environment:
ecological and cultural perspectives: Proceedings of an international
symposium; 1990 March 20-24; Knoxville, TN. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-69.
Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 179-186. [16649]
12. Holmgren, Ralph C.; Brewster, Sam F., Jr. 1972. Distribution of organic
matter reserve in a desert shrub community. Research Paper INT-130.
Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain
Forest and Range Experiment Station. 15 p. [1187]
13. DeLasaux, Michael J.; Pillsbury, Norman H. 1987. Site index and yield
equations for blue oak and coast live oak. In: Plumb, Timothy R.;
Pillsbury, Norman H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the
symposium on multiple-use management of California's hardwood resources;
1986 November 12-14; San Luis Obispo, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-100.
Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 325-334. [5383]
14. Duncan, Don A.; McDougald, Neil K.; Westfall, Stanley E. 1987. Long-term
changes from different uses of foothill hardwood rangelands. In: Plumb,
Timothy R.; Pillsbury, Norman H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of
the symposium on multiple-use management of California's hardwood
resources; 1986 November 12-14; San Luis Obispo, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep.
PSW-100. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 367-372. [5389]
15. Duffield, J. W. 1953. Pine pollen collection dates--annual and
geographic variation. For. Res. Notes No. 85. Berkeley, CA: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, California Forest and Range
Experiment Station. 9 p. [17970]
16. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
17. Mackey, Dennis L. 1986. Brood habitat of Merriam's turkeys in
south-central Washington. Northwest Science. 60(2): 108-112. [5771]
18. Gardner, Robert A. 1958. Soil-vegetation associations in the redwood -
Douglas-fir zone of California. In: Proceedings, 1st North American
forest soils conference; [Date of conference unknown]; East Lansing, MI.
East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Agricultural Experiment
Station: 86-101. [12581]
19. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
20. Geils, B. W.; Mathiasen, R. L. 1990. Intensification of dwarf mistletoe
on southwestern Douglas fir. Forest Science. 36(4): 955-969. [15050]
21. Griffin, James R. 1977. Oak woodland. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Malor,
Jack, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley
and Sons: 383-415. [7217]
22. Griffin, James R. 1980. Sprouting in fire-damaged valley oaks, Chews
Ridge, California. In: Plumb, Timothy R., technical coordinator.
Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology, management, and utilization
of California oaks; 1979 June 26-28; Claremont, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep.
PSW-44. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 216-219. [7040]
23. Griffin, James R.; Critchfield, William B. 1972. The distribution of
forest trees in California. Res. Pap. PSW-82. Berkeley, CA: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and
Range Experiment Station. 118 p. [1041]
24. Halvorson, William L.; Clark, Ronilee A. 1989. Vegetation and floristics
of Pinnacles National Monument. Tech. Rep. No. 34. Davis, CA: University
of California at Davis, Institute of Ecology, Cooperative National Park
Resources Study Unit. 113 p. [11883]
25. Hamilton, Ronald C. 1991. Single-tree selection method: An uneven-aged
silviculture system. In: Genetics/silviculture workshop proceedings;
1990 August 27-31; Wenatchee, WA. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Timber Management Staff: 46-84. [16562]
26. Holland, Robert F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial
natural communities of California. Sacramento, CA: California Department
of Fish and Game. 156 p. [12756]
27. Horton, Jerome S. 1949. Trees and shrubs for erosion control of southern
California mountains. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, California [Pacific Southwest] Forest and Range
Experiment Station; California Department of Natural Resources, Division
of Forestry. 72 p. [10689]
28. Howard, W. E.; Fenner, R. L.; Childs, H. E., Jr. 1959. Wildlife survival
in brush burns. Journal of Range Management. 12: 230-234. [247]
29. Jenkinson, James L. 1977. Edaphic interactions in first-year growth of
California ponderosa pine. Res. Pap. PSW-127. Berkeley, CA: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and
Range Experiment Station. 16 p. [15833]
30. Holechek, Jerry L. 1981. Brush control impacts on rangeland wildlife.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 36(5): 265-269. [1182]
31. Kimmey, J. W. 1957. Dwarfmistletoes of California and their control.
Tech. Pap. No. 19. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, California Forest and Range Experiment Station. 12 p. [16464]
32. Kotok, E. I. 1933. Fire, a major ecological factor in the pine region of
California. In: Pacific Science Congress Proceedings. 5: 4017-4022.
[4723]
33. Krugman, Stanley L.; Jenkinson, James L. 1974. Pinaceae--pine family.
In: Schopmeyer, C. S., technical coordinator. Seeds of woody plants in
the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service: 598-637. [1380]
34. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
35. Lawrence, George E. 1966. Ecology of vertebrate animals in relation to
chaparral fire in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Ecology. 47(2): 278-291.
[147]
36. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native
and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]
37. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
38. McCune, Bruce. 1988. Ecological diversity in North American pines.
American Journal of Botany. 75(3): 353-368. [5651]
39. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
40. Powers, Robert F. 1990. Pinus sabiniana Dougl. Digger pine. In: Burns,
Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of
North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 463-469. [13406]
41. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
42. Sampson, Arthur W.; Jespersen, Beryl S. 1963. California range
brushlands and browse plants. Berkeley, CA: University of California,
Division of Agricultural Sciences, California Agricultural Experiment
Station, Extension Service. 162 p. [3240]
43. Thorne, Robert F. 1977. Montane and subalpine forests of the Transverse
and Peninsular ranges. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Major, Jack, eds.
Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley and Sons:
537-557. [7214]
44. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
45. Wickman, Boyd E. 1964. Freshly scorched pines attract large numbers of
Arhopalus asperatus adults. Pan-Pacific Entomologist. 40(1): 59. [4511]
46. Zedler, Paul H. 1986. Closed-cone conifers of the chaparral. Fremontia.
14(3): 14-17. [18648]
47. Farris, Glenn J. 1983. California pignolia: seeds of Pinus sabiniana.
Economic Botany. 37(2): 201-206. [20648]
48. Griffin, J. R. 1971. Variability of germination in digger pine in
California. Res. Note PSW-248. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range
Experiment Station. 5 p. [19082]
49. Schniewind, Arno P.; Gammon, Barry. 1978. Some strength properties of
digger pine. Wood and Fiber. 9(4): 289-294. [19135]
50. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
51. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [n.d.]. NP
Flora [Data base]. Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National
Biological Survey. [23119]
52. Thompson, Robert S.; Anderson, Katherine H.; Bartlein, Patrick J. 1999. Digital
representations of tree species range maps from "Atlas of United States trees"
by Elbert L. Little, Jr. (and other publications). In: Atlas of relations between
climatic parameters and distributions of important trees and shrubs in North
America. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services (Producer).
On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research
Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; FEIS files. [92575]
FEIS Home Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/tree/pinsab/all.html