Fire Effects Information System (FEIS)
FEIS Home Page

Index of Species Information

SPECIES:  Oplopanax horridus
Mountain hemlock/devilsclub community near Juneau, AK. Wikimedia Commons image by Everett Mar.

Introductory

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Howard, Janet L. 1993. Oplopanax horridus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/oplhor/all.html []. Images were added on 14 August 2018.
ABBREVIATION : OPLHOR SYNONYMS : Oplopanax horridum (J. E. Smith) Miq. NRCS PLANT CODE : OPHO COMMON NAMES : devilsclub devil's-club TAXONOMY : The scientific name of devilsclub is Oplopanax horridus (J. E. Smith) Miq. (Araliaceae)[45,46,48]. LIFE FORM : Shrub FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY


DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Devilsclub is distributed from south-central Alaska south along the Pacific Coast and the western slope of the Cascade Range to southern Oregon and east to southwestern Yukon Territory, Idaho, and western Montana.  Disjunct populations occur on several islands of northern Lake Superior, including Isle Royale and Passage Island, Michigan, and Porphyry and Slate islands, Ontario [30,45,46].  Some authorities [23] extend its distribution to eastern Asia.  Voss [46], however, recognized the Asian plants as a distinct species, Oplopanax elatus (Nakai) Nakai.
Distribution of devilsclub. Map courtesy of USDA, NRCS. 2018. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC [2018, August 14] [44].
ECOSYSTEMS : 
   FRES23  Fir - spruce
   FRES24  Hemlock - Sitka spruce
   FRES28  Western hardwoods


STATES : 
     AK  ID  MI  MT  OR  WA  BC  ON  YT



BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 
    1  Northern Pacific Border
    2  Cascade Mountains
    5  Columbia Plateau
    8  Northern Rocky Mountains


KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : 
   K001  Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest
   K002  Cedar - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest
   K004  Fir - hemlock forest
   K025  Alder - ash forest


SAF COVER TYPES : 
   201  White spruce
   202  White spruce - paper birch
   203  Balsam poplar
   205  Mountain hemlock
   206  Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir
   221  Red alder
   223  Sitka spruce
   224  Western hemlock
   225  Western hemlock - Sitka spruce
   226  Coastal true fir - hemlock
   227  Western redcedar - western hemlock
   228  Western redcedar
   252  Paper birch


HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : 
Devilsclub is a dominant component of understories of various Pacific
Northwest and western boreal forests where moist to wet soil conditions
prevail.  Devilsclub is an indicator of numerous habitat types; some
commonly occurring ones are western redcedar (Thuja plicata)/devilsclub, 
western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla)/devilsclub, Sitka spruce
(Picea sitchensis)-western hemlock/devilsclub, subalpine fir (Abies
lasiocarpa)/devilsclub, and Pacific silver fir (A. amabilis)/devilsclub [2,3,8,9].  
Understories of various forest/devilsclub types are
sometimes nearly pure, dense stands of devilsclub.  Other understories
dominated by devilsclub, however, are species rich, involving mixed
shrub, shrub-fern, or shrub-forb associations [21,27].

A comprehensive list of publications naming devilsclub as a dominant
or indicator species would be prohibitively long.  A geographically
representative selection of such publications is listed below:

Old-growth forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountain national parks [1]
Forest types of the North Cascades National Park Service Complex [2]
Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in
   northwestern Montana [8]
Plant associations and management guide for the Pacific silver fir zone
   and Gifford Pinchot National Forest [9]
Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: a second approximation [11]
Preliminary forest plant association management guide: Ketchikan Area,
   Tongass National Forest [14]
Classification, description, and dynamics of plant communities after
   fire in the taiga of interior Alaska [19]

Devilsclub tree associates not previously mentioned include noble fir
(Abies procera), grand fir (A. grandis), Alaska-cedar (Chamaecyparis
nootkatensis), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), western white pine
(Pinus monticola), lodgepole pine (P. contorta varieties latifolia and
murrayana), shore pine (P. c. var. contorta), bigleaf maple (Acer
macrophyllum), quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), and black cottonwood
(P. trichocarpa) [12,15,38,39].

Shrub associates are Alaska blueberry (Vaccinium alaskaense), ovalleaf
huckleberry (V. ovalifolium), evergreen huckleberry (V. ovatum), bog
blueberry (V. uliginosum), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Rocky
Mountain maple (Acer circinatum), red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea),
prickly currant (Ribes lacustre), and Oregon-grape (Mahonia nervosa)
[14,15,19,38].

Herbaceous associates of devilsclub include queencup beadlily
(Clintonia uniflora), trefoil foamflower (Tiarella trifoliata), starry
false-Solomon's-seal (Smilacina stellata), northern bedstraw (Galium
boreale), softleaved sedge (Carex disperma), woolly sedge (C.
laeviculmis), and coast sedge (C. obnupta) [8,38].  Other common
associates are wood horsetail (Equistum sylvaticum), ladyfern (Athyrium
filixfemina), oak-fern (Gymnocarpium dryopteris), mountain woodfern
(Dryopteris austriaca), and mosses (Mnium spp.) [8,15,27,38].

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Devilsclub is not preferred by browsing animals, probably because of its prickly leaves and stems.  Black-tailed deer, white-tailed deer, and elk utilize it lightly in spring and summer [29,45]; in one study, it comprised an average of 3.4 percent of the summer diet of Roosevelt elk at widely distributed sites on the Pacific Northwest Coast [32].  Moose on Isle Royale, Michigan do not browse it [46]. Devilsclub growing on banks of stream channels provides shade cover for salmonoid fishes and their eggs.  Bear prefer such areas because of the readily available sources of fish and devilsclub berries [14]. Grizzly and black bear also consume devilsclub seeds, leaves, and stems [4,26,33,37]. PALATABILITY : Unpalatable NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Mean value of in-vitro dry-matter digestibility of devilsclub for white-tailed deer is 73.3 percent for leaves and 53.7 percent for stems. Percentage composition of macro- and micronutrients in devilsclub leaves and stems are available [29]. COVER VALUE : Devilsclub provides hiding, escape, and thermal cover for various birds, rodents, and the vagrant shrew [31]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : NO-ENTRY OTHER USES AND VALUES : Devilsclub is planted as an ornamental [34,45]. OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : NO-ENTRY

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Devilsclub is a native, erect to slightly spreading, deciduous shrub from 3.3 to 10 feet (1-3 m) in height.  It is sparsely branched with sharp, dense prickles on stems and prominent leaf veins [24,30,48].  The fruit is a drupe with two to three seeds [23,48].  Cooper and others [11] noted that this species is rhizotomous; other researchers have yet to confirm this.  Devilsclub is drought intolerant [10]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :       Phanerophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Information on devilsclub regeneration is scant.  Seedling growth is apparently slow [34].  Devilsclub reproduces vegetatively, but the method is uncertain.  Vegetative reproduction may be accomplished by rhizomes [11] and/or layering [34].  Stickney [42] tentatively listed it as a root crown sprouter. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Devilsclub is a wet-site indicator [38].  It grows on moderately well-drained to poorly drained, shaded sites.  It is commonly found near springs and streams and in drainage, seepage, and wet bottom areas [5,8,27].  It occurs on variable aspects [9], growing in soils that are sandy, loamy, or silty in texture.  Devilsclub-supporting soils are sometimes skeletal.  Soils are derived from quartzite or from fluvial, colluvial, glaciolacustrine, or morainal deposits [11,6,27].  Soil pH is acid.  It ranges from 4.5 to 6.0 in the western redcedar/devilsclub type of northern Idaho [11], and was measured at 3.8 in the Sitka alder (Alnus viridis spp. sinuata)/devilsclub type of southern Alaska [39]. Soil nutrient levels are medium to very rich [24].  Climate varies from maritime, submarine, and continental types [24].  Elevational ranges for devilsclub in several locations are as follows:                              feet             meters northwestern Montana     3,900-5,000     1,189-1,524 [8] Oregon                   1,300-4,600       396-1,402 [9,25] northern Idaho           1,500-4,900       460-1,495 [11] southeastern Alaska          0-1,700         0-  518 [14,47] SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Devilsclub is moderately shade tolerant [24] and is primarily found in understories of late seral, climax, and old-growth forests.  Best growth is attained in climax (mature) forests [6,8].  Average devilsclub biomass at widely located sites in western hemlock-western redcedar and Sitka spruce-western hemlock forests of southeastern Alaska was as follows [3]: clearcut sites:                 0.00 lb/acre young (30- to 100-year-old):    0.09 lb/acre  (0.1 kg/ha) mature (100- to 250-year old):  4.80 lb/acre  (5.4 kg/ha) old-growth (250+ years):        2.90 lb/acre  (3.3 kg/ha) SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Devilsclub flowers in late spring to midsummer, depending upon location.  Plants in southeastern Alaska bloom in June [45], while plants on the Lake Superior islands bloom in mid-July.  Fruits ripen approximately 4 weeks after flowering and persist over winter [46]. Leaves are dropped within a few days of the first fall frost.  In the Cascade Range of Oregon, leaf abscission occurs in October or November [10].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Sites where devilsclub occurs burn infrequently.  Wildfire is uncommon in various forest-devilsclub types of southeastern Alaska [28]. Typically, the moist ravines and streamside areas serve as a fire break to low- and moderate-severity ground fires.  The return interval for such fires ranges from 50 to 100 years in the western redcedar/devilsclub type of western Montana.  Less often, this type undergoes severe, stand-replacing fire, regressing the site to pioneer conditions. Stand-replacing fires in the western redcedar/devilsclub type of western Montana have historically occurred at intervals ranging from 150 to more than 500 years [13]. Devilsclub adaptations to fire are not well documented.  It may sprout from the root crown [18,42].  Sprouting from rhizomes may also occur [11]. FIRE REGIMES : Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find Fire Regimes". POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Unknown

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Devilsclub is susceptible to fire-kill [18], but its susceptibility by class of fire severity is unknown. PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Postfire recovery of understory species, presumably including devilsclub, in forest/devilsclub types of British Columbia is more rapid than in other forest types.  Researchers credit this to the generally lower fire intensity.  Devilsclub frequency at widely scattered sites in British Columbia that had burned less than 10 years prior to sampling was from 61 to 80 percent [27]. Extrapolating from Alaback's [3] data (see Successional Status), devilsclub is probably absent from burn sites for decades following stand-replacing fire.  Presumably, devilsclub establishes on these sites from animal-dispersed seed after the canopy has closed enough to shade this light-sensitive species. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : Hamilton's Research Papers (Hamilton 2006a, Hamilton 2006b) provide information on prescribed fire and postfire response of plant species, including devilsclub, that was not available when this species review was originally written. FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Overall fire potential is rated as low in western redcedar/devilsclub habitat types of western Montana [17].

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Oplopanax horridus
REFERENCES :  1.  Achuff, Peter L. 1989. Old-growth forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountain        national parks. Natural Areas Journal. 9(1): 12-26.  [7442]  2.  Agee, James K.; Kertis, Jane. 1987. Forest types of the North Cascades        National Park Service Complex. Canadian Journal of Botany. 65:        1520-1530.  [6327]  3.  Alaback, Paul B. 1980. Provisional plant community types of southeastern        Alaska. Unpublished paper on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture,        Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Intermountain Fire        Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 15 p.  [18773]  4.  Almack, Jon. 1986. Grizzly bear habitat use, food habits, and movements        in the Selkirk Mountains, northern Idaho. In: Contreras, Glen P.; Evans,        Keith E., compilers. Proceedings--grizzly bear habitat symposium; 1985        April 30 - May 2; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-207. Ogden, UT: U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research        Station: 150-157.  [10815]  5.  Arno, Stephen F.; Davis, Dan H. 1980. Fire history of western        redcedar/hemlock forests in northern Idaho. In: Stokes, Marvin A.;        Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire        history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81.        Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky        Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 21-26.  [12809]  6.  Banner, Allen; Pojar, Jim; Trowbridge, Rick; Hamilton, Anthony. 1986.        Grizzly bear habitat in the Kimsquit River Valley, coastal British        Columbia: classification, description, and mapping. In: Contreras, Glen        P.; Evans, Keith E., compilers. Proceedings--grizzly bear habitat        symposium; 1985 April 30 - May 2; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-207.        Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain        Research Station: 36-49.  [10810]  7.  Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,        reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's        associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:        U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.        [434]  8.  Boggs, Keith; Hansen, Paul; Pfister, Robert; Joy, John. 1990.        Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in        northwestern Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of        Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Montana        Riparian Association. 217 p. Draft Version 1.  [8447]  9.  Campbell, Alsie Gilbert; Franklin, Jerry F. 1979. Riparian vegetation in        Oregon's western Cascade Mountains: composition, biomass, and autumn        phenology. Bull. No. 14. Seattle, WA: U.S./International Biological        Program, University of Washington, Ecosystem Analysis Studies,        Coniferous Forest Biome. 90 p.  [8433] 11.  Cooper, Stephen V.; Neiman, Kenneth E.; Roberts, David W. 1991. (Rev.)        Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: a second approximation. Gen.        Tech. Rep. INT-236. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest        Service, Intermountain Research Station. 143 p.  [14792] 12.  Corns, I. G. W.; Annas, R. M. 1986. Field guide to forest ecosystems of        west-central Alberta. Edmonton, AB: Canadian Forestry Service, Northern        Forestry Centre. 251 p.  [8998] 13.  Davis, Kathleen M.; Clayton, Bruce D.; Fischer, William C. 1980. Fire        ecology of Lolo National Forest habitat types. INT-79. Ogden, UT: U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and        Range Experiment Station. 77 p.  [5296] 14.  DeMeo, Thomas. 1989. Preliminary forest plant association management        guide: Ketchikan Area, Tongass National Forest. [Portland, OR]: [U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service]. 164 p.  [19017] 15.  Dyrness, C. T.; Franklin, J. F.; Moir, W. H. 1974. A preliminary        classification of forest communities in the central portion of the        western Cascades in Oregon. Bulletin No. 4. Seattle, WA: University of        Washington, Ecosystem Analysis Studies, Coniferous Forest Biome. 123 p.        [8480] 16.  Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and        Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p.  [905] 17.  Fischer, William C. 1981. Photo guide for appraising downed woody fuels        in MT forests: grand fir- larch-Doug.-fir, w. hemlock- w. redceder cover        types. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-96. Ogden UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture,        Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 53 p.        [11127] 18.  Fischer, William C.; Bradley, Anne F. 1987. Fire ecology of western        Montana forest habitat types. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-223. Ogden, UT: U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research        Station. 95 p.  [633] 19.  Foote, M. Joan. 1983. Classification, description, and dynamics of plant        communities after fire in the taiga of interior Alaska. Res. Pap.        PNW-307. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,        Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 108 p.  [7080] 20.  Franklin, Jerry F. 1979. Vegetation of the Douglas-fir region. In:        Heilman, Paul E.; Anderson, Harry W.; Baumgartner, David M., eds. Forest        soils of the Douglas-fir region. Pullman, Wa: Washington State        University, Cooperative Extension Service: 93-112.  [8207] 21.  Franklin, Jerry F.; Moir, William H.; Hemstrom, Miles A.; [and others].        1988. The forest communities of Mount Rainier National Park. Scientific        Monograph Series No 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior,        National Park Service. 194 p.  [12392] 22.  Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].        1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range        ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p.  [998] 23.  Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of        northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New        York Botanical Garden. 910 p.  [20329] 24.  Green, R. N.; Courtin, P. J.; Klinka, K.; [and others]. 1984. Site        diagnosis, tree species selection, and slashburning guidelines for the        Vancouver Forest Region. Land Management Handbook Number 8. Abridged        version. Burnaby, BC: Ministry of Forests, Vancouver Forest Region. 143        p.  [9475] 25.  Halverson, Nancy M.; Topik, Christopher; Van Vickle, Robert. 1986. Plant        association and management guide for the western hemlock zone: Mt. Hood        National Forest. R6-ECOL-232A. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 111 p.  [1068] 26.  Hamilton, Anthony; Archibald, W. Ralph. 1986. Grizzly bear habitat in        the Kimsquit River Valley, coastal British Columbia: evaluation. In:        Contreras, Glen P.; Evans, Keith E., compilers. Proceedings-grizzly bear        habitat symposium; 1985 April 30 - May 2; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep.        INT-207. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,        Intermountain Research Station: 50-56.  [10811] 27.  Hamilton, Evelyn H.; Yearsley, H. Karen. 1988. Vegetation development        after clearcutting and site preparation in the SBS zone. Economic and        Regional Development Agreement: FRDA Report 018. Victoria, BC: Canadian        Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre; British Columbia Ministry of        Forests and Lands. 66 p.  [8760] 28.  Hanley, Thomas A.; Cates, Rex G.; Van Horne, Beatrice; McKendrick, Jay        D. 1987. Forest stand-age related differences in apparent nutritional        quality of forage for deer in southeastern Alaska. In: Provenza,        Frederick D.; Flinders, Jerran T.; McArthur, E. Durant, compilers.        Proceedings--symposium on plant-herbivore interactions; 1985 August 7-9;        Snowbird, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-222. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 9-17.        [7395] 29.  Hanley, Thomas A.; McKendrick, Jay D. 1983. Seasonal changes in chemical        composition and nutritive values of native forages in a spruce-hemlock        forests, southeastern Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-312. Portland, OR: U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and        Range Experiment Station. 41 p.  [8770] 30.  Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1961. Vascular plants of the        Pacific Northwest. Part 3: Saxifragaceae to Ericaceae. Seattle, WA:        University of Washington Press. 614 p.  [1167] 31.  Hoffman, George R. 1960. The small mammal components of six climax plant        associations in eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Ecology. 41(3):        571-572.  [12472] 32.  Jenkins, Kurt J.; Starkey, Edward E. 1991. Food habits of Roosevelt elk.        Rangelands. 13(6): 261-265.  [17351] 33.  Kendall, Katherine C. 1986. Grizzly and black bear feeding ecology in        Glacier National Park, Montana. Progress Report. West Glacier, Montana:        U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Glacier National        Park Biosphere Preserve, Science Center. 42 p.  [19361] 34.  Kruckeberg, A. R. 1982. Gardening with native plants of the Pacific        Northwest. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 252 p.  [9980] 35.  Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation        of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:        American Geographical Society. 77 p.  [1384] 36.  MacKinnon, A.; Meidinger, D.; Klinka, K. 1992. Use of the biogeoclimatic        ecosystem classification system in British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle.        68(1): 100-120.  [18845] 37.  Meehan, William R. 1974. The forest ecosystem of southeast Alaska: 4.        Wildlife habitats. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-16. Portland, OR: U.S. Department        of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range        Experiment Station. 32 p.  [13479] 38.  Minore, Don. 1983. Western redcedar--a literature review. Gen. Tech.        Rep. PNW-150. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest        Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 70 p.        [6564] 39.  Mitchell, W. W. 1968. On the ecology of Sitka alder in the subalpine        zone of south-central Alaska. In: Trappe, J. M.; Franklin, J. F.;        Tarrant, R. F.; Hansen, G. M., eds. Biology of alder: Proceedings of a        symposium; 1967 April 14-15; Pullman, WA. Portland, OR: U.S. Department        of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range        Experiment Station: 45-56.  [17733] 40.  Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant        geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p.  [2843] 41.  Sneck, Kathleen M. Davis. 1970. The fire history Coram Experimental        Forest. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 134 p. Thesis.  [7441] 42.  Stickney, Peter F. 1986. First decade plant succession following the        Sundance Forest Fire, northern Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-197. Ogden,        UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain        Research Station. 26 p.  [2255] 43.  Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern        Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire        Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p.  [20090] 44.  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2018. PLANTS Database, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: https://plants.usda.gov/.  [34262] 45.  Viereck, Leslie A.; Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1972. Alaska trees and        shrubs. Agric. Handb. 410. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service. 265 p.  [6884] 46.  Voss, Edward G. 1985. Michigan flora. Part II. Dicots        (Saururaceae--Cornaceae). Bull. 59. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook        Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Herbarium.        724 p.  [11472] 47.  Yeo, Jeffrey J.; Peek, James M. 1992. Habitat selection by female Sitka        black-tailed deer in logged forests of southeastern Alaska. Journal of        Wildlife Management. 56(2): 253-261.  [18342] 48.  Soper, James H.; Heimburger, Margaret L. 1982. Shrubs of Ontario. Life        Sciences Misc. Publ. Toronto, ON: Royal Ontario Museum. 495 p.  [12907]

FEIS Home Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/oplhor/all.html