Index of Species Information
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Buteo jamaicensis
Introductory
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Buteo jamaicensis
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Tesky, Julie L. 1994. Buteo jamaicensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/animals/bird/buja/all.html [].
ABBREVIATION :
BUJA
COMMON NAMES :
red-tailed hawk
red-tail
chicken hawk
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name for the red-tailed hawk is Buteo
jamaicensis (Gmelin). It is in the family Accipitridae [1]. Seven
recognized subspecies occur in North America and are listed below
[38,49]:
B. jamaicensis spp. alascensis Grinnell
B. jamaicensis ssp. borealis (Gmelin) eastern red-tailed hawk
B. jamaicensis ssp. calurus Cassin western red-tailed hawk
B. jamaicensis spp. fuertesi Sutton
B. jamaicensis spp. harlani (Audubon) Harlin's hawk
B. jamaicensis spp. kirderii Hoopes Krider's hawk
B. jamaicensis ssp. umbrinus Bangs Florida red-tailed hawk
ORDER :
Falconiformes
CLASS :
Bird
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
WILDLIFE DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Buteo jamaicensis
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Red-tailed hawks breed from central Alaska, the Yukon, and the Northwest
Territories east to southern Quebec and the Maritime Provinces and south
to Florida, the West Indies, and Central America. They winter from
southern Canada south throughout the remainder of the breeding range
[1,8,13].
Buteo jamaicensis ssp. alascensis breeds (probably resident) from
southeastern coastal Alaska (Yakutat Bay) to Queen Charlotte Islands and
Vancouver Island, British Columbia [49].
Eastern red-tailed hawks breed from southern Ontario, southern Quebec,
Maine, and Nova Scotia south through eastern Nebraska, eastern Kansas,
and eastern Oklahoma to eastern Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
and northern Florida. They winter from eastern Nebraska, northeastern
Iowa, southern Michigan, southern Ontario, central New York, and
southern Maine south to the Gulf coast and southern Florida. Occasional
breeding occurs from northern Minnesota to northern New England [49].
Western red-tailed hawks breed from central interior Alaska, the Yukon,
the Northwest Territories, and Saskatchewan south to Baja California,
Sonora, and western New Mexico. They range east to Colorado, Wyoming, and
Montana and to northeastern Manitoba, south-central Ontario, central and
eastern Quebec, Prince Edward Island, and Cape Breton Island. Western
red-tailed hawks winter from southwestern British Columbia to southern
Minnesota south and southwest to Guatemala and northern Nicaragua [49].
Buteo jamaicensis ssp. fuertesi breed from northern Chihuahua to Brewster
County, Kerr County, and Corpus Christi in southern Texas south to
south-central Nuevo Leon. They winter in central Sonora, southwestern
Arizona, New Mexico, and southern Louisiana [49].
Harlani red-tailed hawks breed from the Valley of the Yukon and the
Mount Logan area, Alaska, to northern British Columbia east of the Coast
Ranges and southeast to the Red Deer region of Alberta. They winter from
Kansas, southern Missouri, and Arkansas south to Texas and Louisiana
[49].
Krider's red-tailed hawks breed from southern Alberta, southern
Saskatchewan, southern Manitoba, and extreme western Ontario south to
south-central Montana, Wyoming, western Nebraska, ane western Minnesota.
They winter from South Dakota and southern Minnesota south to Arizona,
New Mexico, Durango, Zacatecas, Texas and Louisiana [49].
Florida red-tailed hawks are year-round residents in peninsular Florida
north to Tampa Bay and the Kissimmee Prairie, formerly to San Mateo and
Cedar Keys [49].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES10 White-red-jack pine
FRES11 Spruce-fir
FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine
FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine
FRES14 Oak-pine
FRES15 Oak-hickory
FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress
FRES17 Elm-ash-cottonwood
FRES18 Maple-beech-birch
FRES19 Aspen-birch
FRES20 Douglas-fir
FRES21 Ponderosa pine
FRES22 Western white pine
FRES23 Fir-spruce
FRES24 Hemlock-Sitka spruce
FRES25 Larch
FRES26 Lodgepole pine
FRES27 Redwood
FRES28 Western hardwoods
FRES29 Sagebrush
FRES30 Desert shrub
FRES31 Shinnery
FRES32 Texas savanna
FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe
FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub
FRES35 Pinyon-juniper
FRES36 Mountain grasslands
FRES37 Mountain meadows
FRES38 Plains grasslands
FRES39 Prairie
FRES40 Desert grasslands
FRES41 Wet grasslands
FRES42 Annual grasslands
FRES44 Alpine
STATES :
AL |
AK |
AZ |
AR |
CA |
CO |
CT |
DE |
FL |
GA |
HI |
ID |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
ME |
MD |
MA |
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
MT |
NE |
NV |
NH |
NJ |
NM |
NY |
NC |
ND |
OH |
OK |
OR |
PA |
RI |
SC |
SD |
TN |
TX |
UT |
VT |
VA |
WA |
WV |
WI |
WY |
AB |
BC |
MB |
NB |
NF |
NT |
NS |
ON |
PE |
PQ |
SK |
YT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
1 Northern Pacific Border
2 Cascade Mountains
3 Southern Pacific Border
4 Sierra Mountains
5 Columbia Plateau
6 Upper Basin and Range
7 Lower Basin and Range
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
9 Middle Rocky Mountains
10 Wyoming Basin
11 Southern Rocky Mountains
12 Colorado Plateau
13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont
14 Great Plains
15 Black Hills Uplift
16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
Red-tailed hawks probably occur in most Kuchler Plant Associations
SAF COVER TYPES :
Red-tailed hawks probably occur in most SAF Cover Types
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Red-tailed hawks occur in nearly every open to semiopen plant community
in North America [8,25]. They avoid tundra and dense forests [1,25].
BIOLOGICAL DATA AND HABITAT REQUIREMENTS
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Buteo jamaicensis
TIMING OF MAJOR LIFE HISTORY EVENTS :
Age at sexual maturity - Red-tailed hawks are generally sexually mature
at 2 years of age [38].
Breeding season - The breeding season generally occurs from late January
to September depending on geographic area [16,22,38,46]. Full clutches
may be expected as early as February in warmer parts of California and
in other states bordering Mexico and/or the Gulf coast. For most of the
contiguous United States, clutches are laid in March. In the northern
states and southern Canada, clutches are laid from March to early May.
In interior Alaska clutches are laid from April to late May [38].
Clutch size and incubation - Red-tailed hawks lay two to four eggs, with
three most common [16,22,38,46]. Clutch size may vary with prey
availability [38]. The eggs are incubated for 28 to 34 days [22,38].
If the first clutch is destroyed, red-tailed hawks may lay a replacement
clutch within 3 or 4 weeks [38].
Fledging - Nestlings fledge in 42 to 46 days [16,20,22,38]. Males
fledge earlier than females [38]. Fledglings continue to be fed by
parents and remain within the nesting territory for 30 days or more
after fledging [20].
Migration - Red-tailed hawks migrate as individuals. Some established
breeders (especially in the southern United States) remain on or near
their territories all year. Near Fairbanks, Alaska, a mature red-tailed
hawk spent three consecutive winters in the same territory [38].
Spring migration starts in February and March in northern Mexico and the
southern United States. Early arrivals reach the northern states while
the ground is still under snow. Along the Canadian border in the Great
Lakes region some red-tailed hawks are still migrating in late May and
June [38]. Western red-tailed hawks arrival in Yellowstone National
Park in the spring is probably dependent on the appearance of the ground
squirrels, which come out of hibernation about the first of April [52].
Fall migration from Canada and the adjoining northern states begins in
August and continues through early October. Eastern red-tailed hawks
begin to migrate south from New England and other northern parts of
their range early in September [52]. Further south, red-tailed hawks
begin migrating from early October to mid-December [38].
Longevity - Red-tailed hawks have been reported to live up to 16 years
in the wild and 29 years in captivity [22]. The average longevity for a
red-tailed hawk that survives to maturity is 6 to 7 years [38].
PREFERRED HABITAT :
Red-tailed hawks occupy a wide variety of open to semiopen habitats.
They generally avoid tundra and dense, unbroken woodland [1,9,25,13].
Open to semiopen coniferous, deciduous and mixed woodlands, woodland
edges, grasslands, parklands, rangelands, river bottomlands, and
agricultural fields with scattered trees are preferred. Forest
clearings, alpine meadows, estuaries, and marshes are also commonly used
[6,8,22,34,39]. Hardwood draws surrounded by native prairie are
important habitats in the Great Plains [9]. In Wyoming and Montana,
red-tailed hawks nested in several habitats, but nests were most
numerous in riparian zones. Upland draws with adjacent grassland or
agricultural tracts were also commonly used [51].
Nesting habitat - Red-tailed hawks usually nest in a tall tree in or at
the edge of woodlands, or in an isolated tree in an open area [1,9,13].
Red-tailed hawks frequently select the largest and tallest tree
available [1,13]. In treeless areas red-tailed hawks nest on rocky
cliffs or talus slopes, or in shrubs or cacti [13,28]. In the Sonoran
Desert, red-tailed hawks often nest in large saguaro (Carnegiea
gigantea) with projecting limbs [38]. Red-tailed hawks also nest on
artificial nest structures, the crossbars of utility poles, and towers
[25,38,44]. They sometimes add to an existing raven, crow (Corvus
spp.), gray squirrel (Sciurus spp.), or buteo (Buteo spp.) nest [38].
The nest is generally constructed next to the trunk of a tree in a
crotch or fork from 30 to 90 feet (9-27 m) above the ground [13,46].
Where tall trees are unavailable nests may be located almost on the
ground. Red-tailed hawk nests are at most 6 feet (0.9 m) above the
ground in paloverde (Cercidium spp.) [38]. Nests are often reused from
year to year provided that the nests are not occupied by earlier nesting
raptors [20,51]. The mean distance between occupied nests in Wyoming
and Montana was 1.5 miles (2.4 km) [51].
Red-tailed hawks nest in a wide variety of tree species [8,43,44,45,51].
In central Missouri, 99 percent of red-tailed hawk nests were in
deciduous hardwoods. Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) was the most
frequently selected species (40%). Other species included white
oak (Quercus alba), 32 percent; black oak (Q. velutina), 19.1 percent;
shingle oak (Q. imbricaria), 1.9 percent; eastern redcedar (Juniperus
virginiana), 1.9 percent; red oak (Q. rubra), 0.9 percent; American elm
(Ulmus americana), 0.9 percent; green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), 0.9
percent; shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), 0.9 percent; mockernut hickory
(C. tomentosa), 0.9 percent; and eastern cottonwood (Populus
deltoides), 0.9 percent [45].
In Snohomish County, Washington, only black cottonwood (Populus
trichocarpa) and red alder (Alnus rubra) were utilized for nesting. No
nests were found in conifers [43]. In the highlands of southeastern New
York and northern New Jersey, red-tailed hawks built nests in 10
different species of trees, with the majority in oaks (82%) [44]. In
Wyoming and Montana, the majority (51%)of red-tailed hawk nests were
found in coniferous trees. Forty-seven percent of the nests were found
in deciduous trees and 2 percent were located on cliffs [51]. In
British Columbia, coniferous trees (48%; 8 species) were used slightly
more that deciduous trees (44%; 4 species). Black cottonwood (38%),
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) (19%), and ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosa) (19%) were used most often [8].
Only 13 percent of the red-tailed hawk nests in a study area in
Wisconsin were located in closed-canopy woodlots. Fifty-eight percent
of the nests were located in open groves, generally less than 1 acre
(0.4 ha) in size. Twenty-nine percent were located in isolated trees
along fencelines and ditchbanks. The majority of the nest trees were on
well-drained upland sites [19]. Houston and Bechard [21] documented the
increase of nesting red-tailed hawks following the expansion of trees
into the prairie regions of Saskatchewan [44].
Foraging habitat - Red-tailed hawks generally forage in open habitats
containing lagomorphs, small rodents, and snakes. During the nesting
season red-tailed hawks usually forage within 1.9 miles (3 km) of the
nest [25]. They are often observed hunting in clearcuts and
non-forested areas [35]. Red-tailed hawks usually search for prey from
elevated perches [20,23,38]. Consequently, they commonly occupy areas
that provide a relative abundance of potential perching sites [23].
James [23] found that 40 percent or more or the average red-tailed hawk
home range contained at least 10 perches per 40 acres (16.2 ha). Snags
are commonly used for perches [12,14,31]. Red-tailed hawks in central
Iowa tend to select perches in groves of trees and along woodland edges
[53]. Foraging habitat in the Midwest is limited by large expanses of
cereal crops [9].
Winter habitat - Winter habitat for red-tailed hawks is generally the
same as the nesting habitat, except that high elevation areas are not
used [25]. Wintering red-tailed hawks in Illinois avoided plowed fields
and showed a preference for high perches in areas with groups of trees
or small woodlots [9].
COVER REQUIREMENTS :
Red-tailed hawk nests are generally built on sites that provide a
commanding view of the area and unobstructed access to the nest. Nests
are typically high in a tree that is taller than those surrounding it.
Some researchers have found that red-tailed hawk nests are often located
well up a slope or on a ridge or hilltop [38,44]. However, Speiser and
Bosakowski [44], reported that in the highlands of southeastern New
York
and northern New Jersey red-tailed hawks most often nested between lower
and middle slopes, seldom near the top of a slope and never directly on
a ridgetop. Red-tailed hawks seem to prefer trees with open crowns
[38]. Roost trees for raptors are usually large enough to provide
safety from any predatory threat from the ground. They are typically
the largest trees in the stand; the crown near the top or the middle
portion of the tree is open and have stout lateral limbs with easy
access [50]. Red-tailed hawks are probably more efficient predators in
open areas than in areas with high vegetative cover.
FOOD HABITS :
Red-tailed hawks are versatile, opportunistic predators [38]. Prey
items of red-tailed hawks are numerous. Generally, any animal the size
of a jackrabbit (Lepus spp.) or smaller, including domestic animals, is
potential prey. Red-tailed hawks primarily eat small mammals but also
eat birds, reptiles, and some insects [13,16,20,38]. In Wyoming,
Wisconsin, and Michigan, researchers found that mammals accounted for 93
percent, 85 percent, and 40 percent, respectively, of the prey species
taken [22].
Some prey items reported to be taken by red-tailed hawks include meadow
voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), red-backed voles (Clethrionomys
gapperi), short-tail shrews (Blarina brevicauda), deer mice (Peromyscus
maniculatus), chipmunks (Tamias spp.), tree squirrels (Sciurus spp.),
ground squirrels (Citellus spp.), pikas (Ochotona princeps), prairie
dogs (Cynomys spp.), jackrabbits, cottontails (Sylvilagus spp.), skunks
(Mephitis spp. and Spilogale spp.), raccoons (Procyon lotor), woodchucks
(Marmota spp.), ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus), grouse, and
various songbirds [5,20,22,30,38].
PREDATORS :
Information was not found in the literature regarding predation on
red-tailed hawks or their clutches. However, species that kill other
raptors and destroy their clutches probably also kill red-tailed
hawks. Some raptor predators include great horned owls (Bubo
virginianus) and golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). Other potential
predators include coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus), skunks,
and crows.
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Unlike many other raptor species in North America, red-tailed hawk
populations have increased over much of their range due to fragmentation
of forests into small woodlots and increases in woodland edge [9].
Because of these habitat changes, red-tailed hawks have replaced
red-shouldered hawks (Buteo lineatus) throughout much of the
red-shouldered hawks' former breeding range [41].
To manage a stand for red-tailed hawks, 500 to 1,000 overstory trees per
acre (1,235-2,470/ha) with not more than 40 percent of the trees 8
inches (20 cm) d.b.h. is recommended [35]. Clearcutting is often
detrimental to the nest site but may be beneficial to local populations
of red-tailed hawks by providing foraging habitat [35]. Snags and cull
trees should be retained as perch sites for red-tailed hawks [14,31,50].
Additionally, trees that contain nests should be retained whenever
possible. Protecting habitat used by the prey base may also benefit
red-tailed hawks [50]. Although red-tailed hawks are tolerant of human
activities, construction of home sites degrades the quality of woodlands
by reducing habitat for some prey species [9]. In southeastern New York
and northern New Jersey, no red-tailed hawk nests were found near
high-density suburban housing developments [44].
FIRE EFFECTS AND USE
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Buteo jamaicensis
DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS ON ANIMALS :
Fire directly reduces red-tailed hawk reproductive success if the fire
crowns in occupied nest trees [27]. Fires that kill or otherwise alter
unoccupied nest trees may disrupt reproduction if acceptable nest trees
are scarce. Red-tailed hawks are reported to be attracted to fire and
smoke [15]. They have been reported feeding on grasshoppers fleeing
from fires [27]. Low-severity fires probably have little direct effect
on red-tailed hawks. Landers [27] commented that light winter burning
probably does no substantial harm to raptors.
HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS :
Red-tailed hawks occur in the following 10 major fire-dependent plant
associations in the western United States: grasslands, semidesert
shrub-grasslands, sagebrush (Artemisia spp.)-grasslands, chaparral,
pinyon-juniper (Pinus spp.-Juniperus spp.) woodland, ponderosa pine,
Douglas-fir, spruce-fir (Picea spp.-Abies spp.), redwood (Sequoia
sempervirens), and giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) forests
[29].
Suppression of fires in large expanses of treeless areas may benefit
red-tailed hawks. In southern Saskatchewan, the control of fires on the
once open prairies and the planting of trees and shrubs has resulted in
a semiopen, tree-grassland mosaic and consequent territory expansion and
population increase of red-tailed hawks [38].
Although fire may reduce potential nest trees, it may also create snags
for perch sites and enhance the foraging habitat of red-tailed hawks.
Red-tailed hawks often perch on snags created by lightning strikes [3].
They often use fresh burns when foraging due to increased prey
visibility [15,27,32,36]. Regular prescribed burning helps to maintain
habitat for many prey species of red-tailed hawks [10,15,27,29,32].
Several studies indicate that many prey populations increase rapidly
subsequent to burning in response to increased food availability
[15,27]. Fire suppression in grasslands was detrimental to small bird
and mammal populations due to organic matter accumulation and reduced
plant vigor [47].
The suppression of natural fire in chaparral has resulted in reduced
seral stage diversity and less edge [15] which has probably affected
red-tailed hawks in these communities. Red-tailed hawks are more
abundant in recently burned chaparral areas than in unburned areas due
to greater visibility and less cover for prey [36]. Additionally,
red-tailed hawks are favored by fires that open up or clear
pinyon-juniper woodlands [32]. Raptors associated with pinyon-juniper
woodlands depend upon edges of openings created by fire and scattered
islands of unburned woodlands [15].
In the first year following a severe fire in grassland, ponderosa pine,
Douglas-fir, and mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp.
vaseyana) habitat types on the Salmon National Forest, several
red-tailed hawks were observed within the burn. They were not observed
in the area before the fire [10]. Following a fire in a mountain big
sagebrush community on the Bridger-Teton National Forest, red-tailed
hawks were more commonly observed using an area that experienced a
severe fall fire than in a nearby area burned by a low-severity spring
fire [33]. Red-tailed hawks have also been observed hunting on recently
burned areas in Colorado County, Texas [2].
Although fire is often beneficial to red-tailed hawk prey species, Yensen
and others [48] reported that in the Snake River Birds of Prey Area,
southwestern Idaho, fire may reduce populations of Townsend's ground
squirrels (Spermophilus townsendii).
FIRE USE :
Prescribed fire can be beneficial to red-tailed hawk populations by
enhancing habitat and increasing the prey base [15,27]. Prescribed
burning plans should strive for creation of maximum interspersion of
openings and edge, with high vegetative diversity. Habitats should be
maintained in a random mosaic. In most cases, burning plans must be
integrated with proper range management. Reseeding of perennial grasses
as well as rest from livestock grazing may be necessary to achieve
desired goals. Burning should be deferred until nesting is completed in
areas where impact to breeding red-tailed hawks may occur [15]. After
logging, Benson [4] suggested broadcast burning rather than piling slash
to reduce high temperature fires which may be destructive to soil
organisms and small mammals. For more information regarding the use of
prescribed fire in specific habitats for the benefit of raptors, see
Dodd [15].
An extensive body of research has been published on fire effects on animals
in semidesert grassland, oak savanna, and Madrean oak woodlands of southeastern
Arizona, including the response of red-tailed hawk to fire. See the
Research Project Summary of this work for more information on
red-tailed hawk and more than 100 additional species of birds, small
mammals, grasshoppers, and herbaceous and woody plant species.
FIRE REGIMES :
Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this
species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under
"Find Fire Regimes".
REFERENCES
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Buteo jamaicensis
REFERENCES :
1. American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Checklist of North American birds.
6th ed. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc. 877 p. [21234]
2. Baker, R. H. 1940. Effects of burning and grazing on rodent populations.
Journal of Mammalogy. 21: 223. [2849]
3. Baker, W. Wilson. 1974. Longevity of lightning-struck trees and notes on
wildlife use. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology
conference; 1973 March 22-23; Tallahassee, FL. No. 13. Tallahassee, FL:
Tall Timbers Research Station: 497-504. [19015]
4. Benson, Patrick C. 1979. Land use and wildlife with emphasis on raptors.
[Ogden, UT]: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Intermountain Region. 32 p. On file with: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [17208]
5. Blumstein, Daniel T. 1989. Food habits of red-tailed hawks in Boulder
County, Colorado. Journal of Raptor Research. 23(2): 53-55. [22691]
6. Brown, David E. 1982. Alpine and subalpine grasslands. In: Brown, David
E., ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United States and
Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 109-111. [8894]
7. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
8. Campbell, R. Wayne; Dawe, Neil K.; McTaggart-Cowan, Ian; [and others].
1990. The birds of British Columbia: Vol II: Nonpasserines: Diurnal
birds of prey through woodpeckers. Victoria, BC: Royal British Columbia
Museum. 635 p. [22692]
9. Castrale, John S. 1991. Eastern woodland buteos. In: Pendleton, Beth
Giron; Krahe, Diane L., eds. Proceedings of the midwest raptor
management symposium and workshop; [Date of conference unknown];
Chicago, IL. Scientific and Technical Series No. 15. Washington, DC:
National Wildlife Federation: 50-59. [22706]
10. Collins, Thomas C. 1980. A report on the Moose Creek Fire of August,
1979. Unpublished report on file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Salmon National Forest, North Fork Ranger District,
North Fork, ID. 27+ p. [666]
11. Cress, Gary A.; Langley, William M. 1988. Effect of annual and habitat
variations in prey on the growth and productivity of red-tailed hawks
(Buteo jamaicensis). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science.
91(3-4): 96-102. [22693]
12. DeGraaf, Richard M. 1978. New life from dead trees. National Wildlife.
16(4): 28-31. [13650]
13. DeGraaf, Richard M.; Scott, Virgil E.; Hamre, R. H.; [and others]. 1991.
Forest and rangeland birds of the United States: Natural history and
habitat use. Agric. Handb. 688. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 625 p. [15856]
14. Dickson, James G.; Conner, Richard N.; Williamson, J. Howard. 1983. Snag
retention increases bird use of a clear-cut. Journal of Wildlife
Management. 47(3): 799-804. [13855]
15. Dodd, Norris L. 1988. Fire management and southwestern raptors. In:
Gliski, R. L.; Pendleton, Beth Giron; Moss, Mary Beth; [and others],
eds. Proceedings of the southwest raptor symposium and workshop; 1986
May 21-24; Tucson, AZ. NWF Scientific and Technology Series No. 11.
Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 341-347. [22648]
16. DuBois, Kristi; Becker, Dale; Thornbrugh, Joe. 1987. Identification of
Montana's birds of prey. Montana Outdoors. 18(6): 11-31. [3606]
17. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
18. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
19. Gates, J. M. 1972. Red-tailed hawk populations and ecology in
east-central Wisconsin. Wilson Bulletin. 84: 421-433. [22707]
20. Young, Leonard S. 1989. Effects of agriculture on raptors in the western
United States: an overview. In: Proceedings of the western raptor
symposium and workshop; 1987 October 26-28; Boise, ID. NWF Scientific
and Technical Series No. 12. Washington, DC: National Wildlife
Federation: 209-218. [22649]
21. Houston, C. S.; Bechard, M. J. 1983. Trees and the red-tailed hawk in
southern Saskatchewan. Blue Jay. 41: 99-109. [22705]
22. Ingraldi, Michael F. 1992. The ecology of red-tailed hawks in an
urban/suburban environment. Syracuse, NY: New York State University. 78
p. Thesis. [22695]
23. Janes, Stewart W. 1985. Habitat selection in raptorial birds. In: Cody,
Martin L., ed. Habitat selection in birds. [Place of publication
unknown]: Academic Press Inc: 159-188. [23121]
24. Knight, R. L.; Smith, D. G.; Erickson, A. 1982. Nesting raptors along
the Columbia River in north central Washington. Murrelet. 62: 2-8.
[22708]
25. Kochert, Michael N. 1986. Raptors. In: Cooperrider, Allan Y.; Boyd,
Raymond J.; Stuart, Hanson R., eds. Inventory and monitoring of wildlife
habitat. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land
Management, Denver Service Center: 313-349. [13527]
26. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
27. Landers, J. Larry. 1987. Prescribed burning for managing wildlife in
southeastern pine forests. In: Dickson, James G.; Maughan, O. Eugene,
eds. Managing southern forests for wildlife and fish: a proceedings;
[Date of conference unknown]; [Location of conference unknown]. Gen.
Tech. Rep. SO-65. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 19-27. [11562]
28. Lanier, John W.; Foss, Carol F. 1988. Habitat management for raptors on
large forested tracts and shorelines. In: Proceedings of the northeast
raptor management symposium and workshop; 1988 May 16-18; [Location of
conference unknown]. NWF Science and Technology Series No. 13.
Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 203-208. [22696]
29. Lehman, Robert N.; Allendorf, John W. 1989. The effects of fire, fire
exclusion and fire management on raptor habitats in the western United
States. In: Proceedings of the western raptor management symposium and
workshop; 1987 October 26-28; Boise, ID. Scientific and Technical Series
No. 12. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 236-244. [22324]
30. Luttich, S.; Rusch, D. H.; Meslow, E. C.; Keith, L. B. 1970. Ecology of
red-tailed hawk predation in Alberta. Ecology. 51: 190-203. [22709]
31. Mannan, Robert William. 1977. Use of snags by birds, Douglas-fir region,
Western Oregon. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 114 p. Thesis.
[9896]
32. Mason, Robert B. 1981. Response of birds and rodents to controlled
burning in pinyon-juniper woodlands. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 55
p. Thesis. [1545]
33. McGee, John Michael. 1976. Some effects of fire suppression and
prescribed burning on birds and small mammals in sagebrush. Laramie, WY:
University of Wyoming. 114 p. Dissertation. [16998]
34. Medin, Dean E. 1992. Birds of a Great Basin sagebrush habitat in
east-central Nevada. Res. Pap. INT-452. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 4 p.
[17779]
35. Nelson, Brad B.; Titus, Kimberly. 1988. Silviculture practices and
raptor habitat associations in the Northeast. In: Pendleton, Beth Giron;
LeFranc, Maurice N., Jr.; Moss, Mary Beth, eds. Proceedings of the
northeast raptor management symposium and workshop; 1988 May 16-18;
Syracuse, NY. NWF Science and Technology Series No. 13. Washington, DC:
National Wildlife Federation: 171-179. [22697]
36. Nichols, R.; Menke, J. 1984. Effects of chaparral shrubland fire on
terrestrial wildlife. In: DeVries, Johannes J., ed. Shrublands in
California: literature review and research needed for management.
Contribution No. 191. Davis, CA: University of California, Water
Resources Center: 74-97. [5706]
37. Olendorff, Richard R.; Kochert Michael N. 1977. Land management for the
conservation of birds of prey. In: Chancellor, R. D., ed. World
conference on birds of prey; Report of proceedings; [Date unknown];
[Location unknown]. [Place of publication unknown]: International
Council on Bird Preservation: 294-307. On file with: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [22699]
38. Palmer, Ralph S., editor. 1988. Handbook of North American birds. Volume
5. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 463 p. [22303]
39. Ralph, C. John; Paton, Peter W. C.; Taylor, Cathy A. 1991. Habitat
association patterns of breeding birds ans small mammals in
Douglas-fir/hardwood stands in nw California and sw Oregon. In:
Ruggiero, Leonard F.; Aubry, Keith B.; Carey, Andrew B.; Huff, Mark H.,
technical coordinators. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir
forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-285. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station:
379-393. [17329]
40. Rice, Jane Anderson; Smith, Norman. 1988. Hunting area preferences of
red-tailed hawks and American kestrels in range lands. In: Glinski,
Richard L.; Pendleton, Beth Giron; Moss, Mary Beth; [and others], eds.
Proceedings of the southwest raptor management symposium and workshop;
1986 May 21-24; Tucson, AZ. NWF Science and Technology Series No. 11.
Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 265-273. [22698]
41. Robinson, Scott K. 1991. Effects of habitat fragmentation on midwestern
raptors. In: Pendleton, Beth Giron; Krahe, Diane L., eds. Proceedings of
the midwest raptor management symposium and workshop; [Date of
conference unknown]; Chicago, IL. Scientific and Technical Series No.
15. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 195-202. [22710]
42. Snyder, Noel F. R.; Snyder, Helen A. 1975. Raptors in range habitat. In:
Symposium on management of forest and range habitats for nongame birds:
Proceedings; 1975 May 6-9; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-1. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 190-209. [22700]
43. Speiser, Robert. 1990. Nest site characteristics of red-tailed hawks in
western Washington. Northwestern Naturalist. 71(3): 95-97. [22702]
44. Speiser, Robert; Bosakowski, Thomas. 1988. Nest site preferences of
red-tailed hawks in the highlands of southeastern New York and northern
New Jersey. Journal of Field Ornithology. 59(4): 361-368. [22701]
45. Toland, Brian R. 1990. Nesting ecology of red-tailed hawks in central
Missouri. Transactions, Missouri Academy of Science. 24: 1-16. [22703]
46. Verner, Jared; Boss, Allan S., tech. coords. 1980. California wildlife
and their habitats: western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-37.
Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 439 p. [10237]
47. Wagle, R. F. 1981. Fire: its effects on plant succession and wildlife in
the Southwest. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 82 p. [4031]
48. Yensen, Eric; Quinney, Dana L.; Johnson, Kathrine; [and others]. 1992.
Fire, vegetation changes, and population fluctuations of Townsend's
ground squirrels. American Midland Naturalist. 128(2): 299-312. [19682]
49. American Ornithologists' Union. 1957. Checklist of North American birds.
5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Lord Baltimore Press, Inc. 691 p. [21235]
50. Call, Mayo. 1979. Habitat management guides for birds of prey. Techical
Note 338. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land
Management, Denver Service Center. 70 p. [22451]
51. Phillips, Robert L.; Wheeler, Anne H.; Lockhart, J. Michael; [and
others]. 1990. Nesting ecology of golden eagles and other raptors in
southeastern Montana and northern Wyoming. Fish and Wildlife Technical
Report 26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and
Wildlife Service. 13 p. [15474]
52. Bent, Arthur Cleveland. 1962. Life histories of North American wild
fowl. Part 1. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 244 p. [20027]
53. Fischer, David L.; Ellis, Kevin L.; Meese, Robert J. 1984. inter habitat
selection of diurnal raptors in central Utah. Raptor Research. 18(3):
98-102. [22704]
FEIS Home Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/animals/bird/buja/all.html