Aspen Running Canker

Neodothiora populina Crous, G.C. Adams & Winton

Host(s) in Alaska:

Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)

Habitat(s): boles, branches

Current Status & Distribution in Alaska (2023 Update)

Aspen running canker is an aggressive canker disease that can rapidly kill the cambium of aspen trees as it spreads along tree boles. In intermediate-aged to mature stands, infections can girdle and kill smaller, understory trees within a single season. Because it is so widespread and often found far from roads and population centers, this disease is most likely caused by a native pathogen that is favored by current conditions (host susceptibility or environment). Since it was first noted in 2015, aspen running canker has been mapped throughout the surveyed areas of the Interior and Southcentral Alaska's boreal forest (see Detection Map). In 2023, 20 observations were recorded north of the Alaska Range. Multiple affected trees were detected at most locations with the disease. About 65 acres were aerially mapped at four locations near Tok in the Interior.  

While the disease is spread throughout Alaska’s boreal forest, the highest incidence is in the Tanana-Kuskokwin Lowland Ecoregion, where it is estimated that 30% of trees are infected at many sites and most cankered trees die within a year or two. Canker induced mortality is strongly correlated with drought and aspen leaf miner. While the disease was first found in 2015, the causal agent was finally determined to be a fungus new to science and taxonomically described in 2020/2021.

Collaborators, Drs. Ursel Schuette and Devin Drown, have sequenced its genome and assembled it into 18 putative chromosomes. Individual genes and their functions were identified in collaboration with the Center of Genomics and Bioinformatics at Indiana University. Based on preliminary transcriptomic data, graduate student Jorda Kovash found that aspen seems to mount a constitutive (always active) defense, but potentially has weaknesses in the induced (activated by presence of the pathogen) defense response when infected with N. populina. We are currently processing samples to identify differences in aspen defense response in trees susceptible to N. populina vs. trees that show resistance. We are also working on a transcriptomics project to study the impacts of drought, carbon stress due to aspen leafminer, and shading on the susceptibility of aspen to this disease. 

Over the last several years, we have worked to isolate the elusive causal fungus, which doesn't produce diagnostic fruiting structures. We have inoculated healthy trees with isolated fungi from infected trees to demonstrate the pathogenicity of the causal agent. We have recently determined which fungus causes this disease in partnership with Dr. Gerry Adams (University of Nebraska Lincoln) and Dr. Pedro Crous (Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Netherlands). It is a fungus new to science that we have named Neodothiora populina Crous, G.C. Adams & Winton (Crous et al. 2020. Persoonia 45: 251-409, available here). In combination with drought and aspen leafminer defoliation damage, aspen running canker is causing notable mortality in Alaska's boreal forest, especially north of the Alaska Range (Ruess et al.2021, PLoS ONE 16(4): e0250078, available here). Neodothiora populina was determined to be the cause of aspen running canker through aspen inoculations in the field and log inoculations in a growth chamber, fullfilling Koch's postulates (Winton et al. 2021, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, available here).

See this aspen running canker poster (2019).

Return to top

Historic Activity

Forest Health Protection has recently initiated an extensive tree health monitoring network through partnerships with several forest inventory programs: the Cooperative Alaska Forest Inventory (CAFI), Department of Defense Forest Management, and Bonanza Creek Long-Term Ecological Research (BNZ LTER). Each program collects data on disease and insect damage, tree growth, vegetation, soils, and other ecological measurements within permanent plots. Through the CAFI partnership we began noticing significant aspen canker mortality in 2014 when we visited long-term research plots. This was due to the U.S. Forest Service Evaluation & Monitoring Grant Utilizing Cooperative Alaska Forest Inventory Permanent Plots for Boreal Forest Disease Detection and Quantification.

Beginning in 2015, the BNZ LTER inventoried all permanently-tagged aspen trees within intermediate-aged stands (40-60 years old) in the Regional Site Network (RSN) in Interior Alaska. The RSN was established to monitor long-term changes in forest composition and function in response to changes in fire regime. Whether this large amount of aspen mortality is a sudden phenomenon, has been slowly increasing, or remains in a static state is unknown. The BNZ LTER is well positioned to study these dynamics over the next several decades.

Return to top

Symptoms, Biology & Impacts

The canker is often subtle in appearance, although sometimes colorfully orange, and can girdle and kill trees within a single season with no apparent host defenses. It is called running canker because it rapidly kills cambium as it expands along nearly the entire bole. Most infected trees die within the year as the tree is girdled. We initiated a joint venture agreement with Dr. Roger Ruess (University of Alaska Fairbanks) in 2016 to conduct research to gain a better understanding of disease distribution and the factors influencing disease spread. We have been working to identify the causal fungus over the past few years. Vertically elongated cankers ‘run’ along the bole and can girdle and kill trees within a single season. Canker-killed aspen can often be seen from the road system of Interior Alaska.

Estimates from 2016 indicate that up to 50% of the aspen biomass within the Bonanza Creek Long-Term Ecological Research (BNZ LTER) intermediate-aged stands is infected with canker. Across stands, up to 65% of aspen trees had cankers, and most of those trees were dead. This data is presented in Figures 7 and 9 in the Forest Health Conditions in Alaska 2016 report. We suspect values for percent incidence in live trees are conservative given the difficulty in detecting canker within the upper canopy and the extended latent phase of most diseases.

In 2017, we evaluated 78 study sites across five ecoregions. We found canker at 81% of the sites. The percentage of infected trees at sites with canker ranged from 1.5% - 64%. Among the five Alaska boreal ecoregions in which we sampled, disease was significantly higher north of the Alaska Range compared to the two ecoregions south of the Alaska Range (Cook Inlet Basin and Cooper River Basin). The highest levels of disease were found in the Tanana-Kuskokwim Lowlands, with significantly lower infection rates in each of the other four ecoregions (Cooper River Basin, Cook Inlet Basin, Yukon-Tanana Uplands, Ray Mountains). Canker infection incidence was higher on smaller diameter trees, and increased with stand-level aspen basal area and density, and average aspen diameter at breast height (which is our best indicator of stand age). Smaller diameter trees in older stands were particularly vulnerable to the canker, and most were dead from the disease. However, small diameter trees in young stands were almost completely devoid of canker. There are a number of potential reasons for this, and we initiated an inoculation experiment last summer to explore whether these young trees are immune to the canker, due perhaps to higher levels of chemical defense, or whether they are simply not getting the disease, perhaps due to low levels of wounding compared with similarly-sized trees in older stands. In 2018, we also installed a shading experiment. Interestingly, smaller diameter trees in older stands may be “carrying” the disease and increasing infection incidence in older trees, since older trees in mature stands without a similar small-diameter cohort have very low canker incidence.

Over the next couple of decades, we anticipate that loss of aspen canopy in intermediate-aged stands in the interior will release white and black spruce growing in the understory. Most of these stands are mixed conifer/hardwood, and spruce is currently limited by shade and snowshoe hare browsing. Release of spruce will ultimately reshape stand structure and ecosystem function. Aspen abundance on the landscape has been expected to increase with a shift in the fire regime towards larger, more severe fires that burn through organic layers and expose mineral soil. This would create a more favorable substrate for hardwood seedling establishment. If the current canker outbreak persists, the successional dynamics of these post-fire stands is uncertain, particularly on drier slopes where aspen dominates. In contrast, birch dominates in wetter soils.

Return to top

Survey Method

Detection Map

Links to Resources & Publications

Bonanza Creek Long-term Ecological Research: Regional Site Network, University of Alaska Fairbanks (Website)

Crous et al. 2020. Fungal Planet description sheets: 1112–1181. Persoonia 45: 251-409. Available here (doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.10).

Ruess R.W., Winton, L. M., Adams, G. C. 2021. Widespread mortality of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) throughout interior Alaskan boreal forests resulting from a novel canker disease. PLoS ONE 16(4). Available here (doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250078). 

Winton, L. M., Ruess, R. W., Adams, G. C. February 2018. Utilizing forest inventory permanent plots for boreal forest disease detection and quantification: aspen running canker. Poster presentation. Available as pdf and html. 

Winton, L. M., Ruess, R. W., Adams, G. C. 2020. Utilizing forest inventory permanent plots for boreal forest disease detection and quantification: aspen running canker. Poster presentation. Available as pdf. 

Winton L. M., Adams G. C., Ruess R. W. 2021. Determining the novel pathogen Neodothiora populina as the causal agent of the aspen running canker disease in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology. Available here (doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2021.1952487).

Content prepared by Lori Winton, PhD Forest Pathologist, Forest Health Protection, loretta.winton@usda.gov.

Contact us    Forest Health Protection Homepage